Abstract
An experiment was conducted at Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute (BSRI) farm, Ishurdi for consecutive two years starting from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010 to find out the suitable mustard variety for mustard-mungbean sequential intercropping with paired row transplanted sugarcane. Tori 7, BARI Sarisha 9, BARI Sarisha 11, BARI Sarisha 15, BINA Sarisha 3 and BINA Sarisha 4 were used as mustard varieties. In this trial, PRC + onion -mungbean treatment combination was used as standard check. Results revealed that sequential intercropping practices did not affect sugarcane yield and juice quality. All the sequential intercropping treatments showed higher BCR than the sole cane crop. Among the treatment combinations, PRC + BARI Sarisha 9 -Mungbean performed better in respect of yield and yield contributing characters of sugarcane, yield of mungbean, net return, BCR and LER. Therefore, mustard (BARI Sarisha 9) -mungbean sequential intercropping with paired row transplanted sugarcane could be considered as a profitable combination for sustainable sugarcane farming with maintaining soil health.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential intercropping practices did not affect sugarcane yield and juice quality.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- sequential intercropping practicese1
- Outcome
- sugarcane yield and juice qualitye1
- Direction
- did not affecte1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Paired Row Sugarcane”
e1“sequential intercropping practices did not affect sugarcane yield and juice quality”
Claim · model-written summary
All sequential intercropping treatments gave a higher BCR than the sole sugarcane crop.
Verbatim
t0“Paired Row Sugarcane”
e2“All the sequential intercropping treatments showed higher BCR than the sole cane crop”
Claim · model-written summary
PRC + BARI Sarisha 9 - mungbean performed better than the other combinations for sugarcane yield and yield-contributing characters.
Verbatim
t0“Paired Row Sugarcane”
e3“Among the treatment combinations, PRC + BARI Sarisha 9 -Mungbean performed better in respect of yield and yield contributing characters of sugarcane, yield of mungbean, net return, BCR and LER”
Claim · model-written summary
PRC + BARI Sarisha 9 - mungbean performed better than the other combinations for mungbean yield, net return and BCR.
Verbatim
t0“Paired Row Sugarcane”
e3“Among the treatment combinations, PRC + BARI Sarisha 9 -Mungbean performed better in respect of yield and yield contributing characters of sugarcane, yield of mungbean, net return, BCR and LER”
Claim · model-written summary
PRC + BARI Sarisha 9 - mungbean performed better than the other combinations for LER.
Verbatim
t0“Paired Row Sugarcane”
e3“Among the treatment combinations, PRC + BARI Sarisha 9 -Mungbean performed better in respect of yield and yield contributing characters of sugarcane, yield of mungbean, net return, BCR and LER”
Claim · model-written summary
Mustard (BARI Sarisha 9)-mungbean sequential intercropping with paired-row sugarcane could be considered a profitable combination for sustainable sugarcane farming.
Verbatim
t0“Paired Row Sugarcane”
e4“mustard (BARI Sarisha 9) -mungbean sequential intercropping with paired row transplanted sugarcane could be considered as a profitable combination for sustainable sugarcane farming”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna radiata · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →intercropping · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.