Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mungbean intercropping reduced mean cane yield by 9.2%.

A claim from Effect of irrigation scheduling on performance of summer legumes grown in 'association of sugarcane · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean intercropping reduced mean cane yield by 9.2%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
mungbeane0
Interactor
mungbeanVigna radiatae0other
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
9.2%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean reduction in cane yield was 14.2% with cowpea, 11.5% with urdbean and 9.2% with mungbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–806
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–99

Title

Effect of irrigation scheduling on performance of summer legumes grown in 'association of sugarcane

N.S. RANA; SANJAY KUMAR; S.K. SAINI Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v50i4.5127

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-3d3c1059cd14653fb823d0c8b0b459a04ef58422863e2e56c752b10b266f2994 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Vigna radiata · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.