Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Performances de trois variétés de manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) cultivées en association avec Stylosanthes guianensis (Aublet) Swartz dans les conditions du plateau des Batéké (ville-province de Kinshasa, RDC)

Bulakali, BP.; Aloni, J.; Palata, JC.; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Performance of Three Varieties of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Grown in Association with Stylosanthes guianensis (Aublet) Swartz in the Conditions of the Batéké Plateau (City-Province of Kinshasa, DRC). In order to develop a system of direct seeding in a permanent vegetative cover of Stylosanthes guianensis (Aublet) Swartz adapted to the growing conditions of the Batéké plateau, the behavior of improved cassava varieties ZIZILA, TME 419 and BUTAMU was evaluated in sole cropping and in intercropping with Stylo. The trial was conducted from October 2009 to August 2011 in two sites representative of the soil diversity on the plateau. The results demonstrate the existence of a strong competition between the associated crops during the 1st year of cultivation. Yield losses recorded compared to situations of sole cropping ranged on average between 22,6-35% for the biomass of Stylo cut at 8 months in the two trial sites, and amounted to about 50% for cassava harvested at 12 months. Delaying the harvest of cassava to 16 months, with a cutting of the Stylo canopy to form a mulch at the end of the long dry season (8 months after planting), has permitted cassava to reach yields equivalent to the situation of sole cropping. The average yields of fresh cassava roots were significantly lower in the site of Neema (9.7 t.ha-1 at 12 months in sole cropping) compared to those recorded in the site of The Way (12.8 t.ha-1 at 12 months in sole cropping). In each site, no significant difference could be detected for the yields of the compared cassava clones cultivated in pure stand. When harvesting cassava at 12 months, the production of Stylo dry biomass was equivalent at 20 months regardless of the installation mode (sole cropping or intercropping with cassava). The trial did not permit to clearly separate the cassava varieties for their intercropping ability with Stylo. The intercropping of Stylo with cassava is a cost effective method to install a permanent cover in which it is possible to make direct seeding of other crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A strong competition between the associated cassava and Stylo crops was demonstrated during the first year of cultivation.

Outcome
strong competition between the associated cropse1
Qualifier
1st year of cultivatione1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“The results demonstrate the existence of a strong competition between the associated crops during the 1st year of cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stylo biomass cut at 8 months showed yield losses averaging 22.6-35% in intercropping compared with sole cropping in the two trial sites.

Treatment
intercropping with cassavae2
Outcome
biomass of Stylo cut at 8 monthse1
Direction
lossese1
Value
22,6-35%e1
Comparator
sole croppinge1
Setting
the two trial sitese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stylosanthes guianensis
Stylosanthes guianensis · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yield losses recorded compared to situations of sole cropping ranged on average between 22,6-35% for the biomass of Stylo cut at 8 months in the two trial sites, and amounted to about 50% for cassava harvested at 12 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–994 · show in text ↑
e2

“intercropping with cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava harvested at 12 months showed yield losses of about 50% in intercropping with Stylo compared with sole cropping.

Treatment
intercropping with Styloe2
Outcome
Yield lossese1
Direction
lossese1
Value
about 50%e1
Comparator
sole croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yield losses recorded compared to situations of sole cropping ranged on average between 22,6-35% for the biomass of Stylo cut at 8 months in the two trial sites, and amounted to about 50% for cassava harvested at 12 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–994 · show in text ↑
e2

“intercropping with Stylo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying cassava harvest to 16 months, with Stylo cut to form a mulch at 8 months after planting, allowed intercropped cassava to reach yields equivalent to sole cropping.

Treatment
Delaying the harvest of cassava to 16 monthse1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
equivalente1
Qualifier
cutting of the Stylo canopy to form a mulche1
Comparator
sole croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Delaying the harvest of cassava to 16 months, with a cutting of the Stylo canopy to form a mulch at the end of the long dry season (8 months after planting), has permitted cassava to reach yields equivalent to the situation of sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1236 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fresh cassava root yields were significantly lower at the Neema site (9.7 t/ha at 12 months in sole cropping) than at The Way site (12.8 t/ha).

Outcome
average yields of fresh cassava rootse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
9.7 t.ha-1e1
Comparator
the site of The Waye1
Setting
the site of Neemae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average yields of fresh cassava roots were significantly lower in the site of Neema (9.7 t.ha-1 at 12 months in sole cropping) compared to those recorded in the site of The Way (12.8 t.ha-1 at 12 months in sole cropping)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1462 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference was detected in yields among the compared cassava clones grown in pure stand at each site.

Material
compared cassava clonese1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Qualifier
pure stande1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In each site, no significant difference could be detected for the yields of the compared cassava clones cultivated in pure stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When cassava was harvested at 12 months, Stylo dry biomass at 20 months was equivalent regardless of sole cropping or intercropping with cassava.

Treatment
intercropping with cassavae1
Outcome
production of Stylo dry biomasse1
Direction
equivalente1
Comparator
sole croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stylosanthes guianensis
Stylosanthes guianensis · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When harvesting cassava at 12 months, the production of Stylo dry biomass was equivalent at 20 months regardless of the installation mode (sole cropping or intercropping with cassava)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trial did not clearly separate the cassava varieties for their intercropping ability with Stylo.

Outcome
intercropping ability with Styloe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The trial did not permit to clearly separate the cassava varieties for their intercropping ability with Stylo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–1888 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping Stylo with cassava is a cost-effective method to install a permanent cover in which direct seeding of other crops is possible.

Outcome
cost effective method to install a permanent covere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stylosanthes guianensis
Stylosanthes guianensis · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The intercropping of Stylo with cassava is a cost effective method to install a permanent cover in which it is possible to make direct seeding of other crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–2047 · show in text ↑

Stylosanthes guianensis · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

intercropping · yield · Stylosanthes guianensis (stylo)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.