Paper · 1993 · Australian Forestry

Merchantability of Pinus radiata in relation to previous land use

E. M. Birk; V. J. Bowman; J. A. Fulton; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary An integrated thinning operation was carried out in 21-year-old radiata pine stands in the central tablelands of New South Wales to examine the effect of previous land use and associated problems of poor tree form on recovery of merchantable timber. The areas thinned were contiguous sections of plantation which had different types of land use prior to plantation establishment; native forest, cleared grazing land (pasture) and cleared land initially grazed and subsequently cultivated and cropped (cultivated pasture). Total volumes of harvested trees (to 8 cm small end diameter) were estimated (assuming no poor tree form) from regressions relating volume to stem diameter. This estimate was compared with the actual volume of saw logs and pulp wood recovered on site and with merchantable yields predicted using a locally derived Forestry Commission equation. On-site yields of saw logs plus pulp wood were 143 m3 ha−1 from the ex-native forest site, 191 m3 ha−1 from the ex-cultivated pasture site and 210 m3 ha−1 from the ex-pasture site. This represented a total recovery of more than 90% of the total stem volume to 8 cm small end diameter from ex-native forest and ex-pasture trees compared with 73% from the ex-cultivated pasture trees. Of the trees harvested, 45% from the ex-native forest site had stem defects compared with 65% from the ex-pasture site and 88% from the ex-cultivated pasture site. These defects reduced the average saw log volume per tree by at least 50% in trees greater than 35 cm DBHOB. In contrast, the yield of pulpwood was similar for deformed and non-deformed trees because some logs which did not meet saw log specifications were down-graded to pulp logs. Keywords: stem deformationyieldpoor tree formmultiple leadersstem distortionmalformationvolumethinning

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pine timber yield was 143 m3 ha−1 at the ex-native forest site site.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
On-site yields of saw logs plus pulp woode0
Value
143 m3 ha−1e0
Setting
ex-native forest sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On-site yields of saw logs plus pulp wood were 143 m3 ha−1 from the ex-native forest site, 191 m3 ha−1 from the ex-cultivated pasture site and 210 m3 ha−1 from the ex-pasture site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pine timber yield was 191 m3 ha−1 at the ex-cultivated pasture site site.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
On-site yields of saw logs plus pulp woode0
Value
191 m3 ha−1e0
Setting
ex-cultivated pasture sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On-site yields of saw logs plus pulp wood were 143 m3 ha−1 from the ex-native forest site, 191 m3 ha−1 from the ex-cultivated pasture site and 210 m3 ha−1 from the ex-pasture site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pine timber yield was 210 m3 ha−1 at the ex-pasture site site.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
On-site yields of saw logs plus pulp woode0
Value
210 m3 ha−1e0
Setting
ex-pasture sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On-site yields of saw logs plus pulp wood were 143 m3 ha−1 from the ex-native forest site, 191 m3 ha−1 from the ex-cultivated pasture site and 210 m3 ha−1 from the ex-pasture site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timber recovery exceeded 90% at ex-native forest and ex-pasture sites versus 73% at the ex-cultivated pasture site.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
total stem volumee0
Direction
more thane0
Value
more than 90%e0
Qualifier
73%e0
Comparator
ex-cultivated pasture treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more than 90% of the total stem volume to 8 cm small end diameter from ex-native forest and ex-pasture trees compared with 73% from the ex-cultivated pasture trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem defects occurred in 45% of trees at the ex-native forest site site.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
stem defectse0
Value
45%e0
Setting
ex-native forest sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“45% from the ex-native forest site had stem defects compared with 65% from the ex-pasture site and 88% from the ex-cultivated pasture site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem defects occurred in 65% of trees at the ex-pasture site site.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
stem defectse0
Value
65%e0
Setting
ex-pasture sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“45% from the ex-native forest site had stem defects compared with 65% from the ex-pasture site and 88% from the ex-cultivated pasture site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem defects occurred in 88% of trees at the ex-cultivated pasture site site.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
stem defectse0
Value
88%e0
Setting
ex-cultivated pasture sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“45% from the ex-native forest site had stem defects compared with 65% from the ex-pasture site and 88% from the ex-cultivated pasture site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem defects reduced saw log volume per tree by at least 50% for trees over 35 cm DBHOB.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Organ / stage
treese0
Outcome
average saw log volume per treee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
at least 50%e0
Qualifier
greater than 35 cm DBHOBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These defects reduced the average saw log volume per tree by at least 50% in trees greater than 35 cm DBHOB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulpwood yield was similar for deformed and non-deformed trees.

Taxon
Pinus radiataPinus radiatat0
Outcome
yield of pulpwoode0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
non-deformed treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of pulpwood was similar for deformed and non-deformed trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑