Paper · 2016 · Journal of Ecology

Facultative grazing and bioturbation by macrodetritivores alter saltmarsh plant–plant interactions under stress

Ruth A. Howison; Han Olff; Marinka E. B. van Puijenbroek; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary The importance of positive plant – plant interactions is generally suggested to increase towards more stressful conditions, due to mutual stress amelioration between plants. Bioturbating macrodetritivores can also ameliorate stress through bioturbation, but can also become selective herbivores under food‐limited conditions, making the outcome of plant – plant interactions under stress in the presence of macrodetritivores unclear. We studied how combining environmental stress (waterlogging) with the presence of the soil macrodetritivore Orchestia gammarellus affected the outcome of the interaction between two salt marsh plants: the tall, late successional Elytrigia atherica and the shorter, early successional Festuca rubra . In a replacement design competition experiment under controlled conditions, we found that soil redox potential was negatively affected by waterlogging and positively affected by the presence of O. gammarellus . The survival and shoot biomass of E. atherica was not significantly affected by waterlogging or by the presence of bioturbators. The survival and shoot biomass of F. rubra was especially decreased when waterlogging was combined with the presence of O. gammarellus , as this macrodetritivore turned into a selective grazer on F. rubra under these conditions. We found that E. atherica produced double shoot biomass and F. rubra produced much less shoot biomass in their mixed cultures than was expected from the monocultures of same waterlogging/ Orchestia treatments. Hence, the presence of the bioturbator strongly promoted the competitive advantage of E. atherica over F. rubra due to the combination of stress amelioration for the first species and selective herbivory on the second species. Synthesis . This study shows that the inclusion of bioturbating macrodetritivores complicates the standard prediction that plant – plant interactions become more positive towards more stressful conditions. A novel insight is that macrodetritivores can affect the structure and diversity of plant communities through multiple mechanisms. Under benign conditions bioturbating macrodetritivores ameliorated soil conditions, permitting co‐occurrence of competing plant species. At high environmental stress (waterlogging) macrodetritivores selectively graze higher quality plant species and emerging seedlings, thus promoting dominance of the lower quality species. Hence, the facultative feeding behaviour of macrodetritivores deserves further attention.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging lowered soil redox potential.

Taxon
Elytrigia athericaElymus athericuse1
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
soil redox potentiale0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elymus athericus
Elymus athericus · TaxonStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil redox potential was negatively affected by waterlogging and positively affected by the presence of O. gammarellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elytrigia atherica and the shorter, early successional Festuca rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. gammarellus increased soil redox potential.

Taxon
Elytrigia athericaElymus athericuse1
Treatment
presence of O. gammarelluse0
Interactor
O. gammarellusOrchestia gammarelluse0herbivore
Outcome
soil redox potentiale0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elymus athericus
Elymus athericus · TaxonStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orchestia gammarellus
Orchestia gammarellus · InteractorAuguste Le Roux · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil redox potential was negatively affected by waterlogging and positively affected by the presence of O. gammarellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elytrigia atherica and the shorter, early successional Festuca rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

E. atherica survival and shoot biomass were not significantly changed by waterlogging.

Taxon
E. athericaElymus athericuse0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
survival and shoot biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elymus athericus
Elymus athericus · TaxonStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival and shoot biomass of E. atherica was not significantly affected by waterlogging or by the presence of bioturbators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

E. atherica survival and shoot biomass were not significantly changed by bioturbators.

Taxon
E. athericaElymus athericuse0
Treatment
presence of bioturbatorse0
Outcome
survival and shoot biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elymus athericus
Elymus athericus · TaxonStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival and shoot biomass of E. atherica was not significantly affected by waterlogging or by the presence of bioturbators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined waterlogging and O. gammarellus decreased F. rubra survival and shoot biomass.

Taxon
F. rubraFestuca rubrae0
Treatment
waterlogging was combined with the presence of O. gammarelluse0
Interactor
O. gammarellusOrchestia gammarelluse0herbivore
Outcome
survival and shoot biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca rubra
Festuca rubra · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 12:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orchestia gammarellus
Orchestia gammarellus · InteractorAuguste Le Roux · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival and shoot biomass of F. rubra was especially decreased when waterlogging was combined with the presence of O. gammarellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1216 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. atherica produced double the expected shoot biomass in mixed cultures.

Taxon
E. athericaElymus athericuse0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
doublee0
Value
doublee0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elymus athericus
Elymus athericus · TaxonStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. atherica produced double shoot biomass and F. rubra produced much less shoot biomass in their mixed cultures than was expected from the monocultures of same waterlogging/ Orchestia treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. rubra produced less shoot biomass than expected in mixed cultures.

Taxon
F. rubraFestuca rubrae0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
much lesse0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca rubra
Festuca rubra · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 12:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. atherica produced double shoot biomass and F. rubra produced much less shoot biomass in their mixed cultures than was expected from the monocultures of same waterlogging/ Orchestia treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1520 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Festuca rubraResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.