Paper · 2015 · Turkish Journal Of Field Crops

MAIZE GROWTH, YIELD FORMATION AND WATER-NITROGEN USAGE IN RESPONSE TO VARIED IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN SUPPLY UNDER SEMI-ARID CLIMATE

Umair ASHRAF; Mazhar Noor SALIM; Alam SHER; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Enhancement of resource use efficiencies and crop productivity in sustainable agriculture are importantespecially in low-input production systems. This experiment was planned to evaluate the performance of maizeunder different water and nitrogen levels. Three irrigation treatments i.e., I1= three leaf stage (V1), nine leafstage (V2), tasseling (T) and milking stage (M); I2 = V1, V2, T, M and dough stage (R1), I3= V1, V2,T, M , R1 and blister stage (R2) were applied with 70 mm application depth with different nitrogen applicationrates i.e., 0 , 150, 200 and 250 kg N ha-1. Results revealed that maximum growth i.e., plant height, leaf areaindex (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), cob length and diameter as well as yield and yield components i.e.,grains rows/cob, grains/row, grains/cob, grain weight/cob, 100-grain weight, grain yield, biological yield andharvest index, water and nitrogen use efficiencies as well as transpiration and photosynthetic activities wererecorded at I3 with 250 kg N ha-1. However, increased irrigation and nitrogen application rates delayed days totasseling, silking and maturity. Conclusively, six irrigations (I3) with 250 kg N ha-1 can be adopted as the bestinput levels to get maximum maize yield under semi-arid regions. In future both these inputs may be used aswater and nitrogen based agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in regions with similar type ofenvironmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I3 irrigation with 250 kg N ha-1 gave maximum maize growth and yield measures.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
I3 with 250 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
plant height, leaf areaindex (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum growth i.e., plant height, leaf areaindex (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), cob length and diameter as well as yield and yield components i.e.,grains rows/cob, grains/row, grains/cob, grain weight/cob, 100-grain weight, grain yield, biological yield andharvest index, water and nitrogen use efficiencies as well as transpiration and photosynthetic activities wererecorded at I3 with 250 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE GROWTH, YIELD FORMATION AND WATER-NITROGEN USAGE IN RESPONSE TO VARIED IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN SUPPLY UNDER SEMI-ARID CLIMATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.