Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences

The Inhibitory Properties of Organic Pest Control Agents against Aphid (Aphididae: Homoptera) on Canola Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae) Under Field Environment

Muhammad Sarwar

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Resistance in aphid to pesticides appears to have been the cause of failure in controlling this pest in certain cropping systems. This study is to report the insecticidal property of botanicals and their potential as organic pest control agents for field management of aphid on Canola Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae). Aphid species Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) was frequently found in large number or of major agronomical importance at the experimental place. The effectiveness of four botanical pest control agents such as, Tobacco Nicotiana tabacum L., Garlic Allium sativum L., Goosefoot Chenopodium album L., and Aloe vera L., was assessed through foliar applications on canola (B. napus) crop. The toxicity of botanicals differed significantly depending upon the treatment applied. The A. vera (Aloeaceae) and to a greater extent N. tabacum at 10% concentration were the most effective botanicals and rated parallel for effectiveness in treated crop and had the least aphid's damage and enhanced yield across all the season followed by C. album and A. sativum relative to the untreated control that had the most damaged plants by pest resulting in reduced yield. Consequently, the performances of A. vera and N. tabacum as botanical pesticides were observed the best in reducing pest and seed damage, as these did not induce any adverse effect on plant and showed that there is a prospective to use them in an integrated pest management system, being safe and economical for oilseeds production and protection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myzus persicae was frequent and agronomically important at the experimental site.

Taxon
Canola Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Interactor
Myzus persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) was frequently found in large numbere0
Setting
experimental placee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aphid species Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) was frequently found in large number or of major agronomical importance at the experimental place”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–477 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Canola Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe spray at 10% was among the most effective and reduced aphid damage relative to untreated control.

Treatment
A. verae0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid's damagee0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The A. vera (Aloeaceae) and to a greater extent N. tabacum at 10% concentration were the most effective botanicals and rated parallel for effectiveness in treated crop and had the least aphid's damage and enhanced yield across all the season followed by C. album and A. sativum relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“on canola (B. napus) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“The toxicity of botanicals differed significantly depending upon the treatment applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco spray at 10% was the most effective and reduced aphid damage relative to untreated control.

Treatment
N. tabacum at 10% concentratione0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid's damagee0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The A. vera (Aloeaceae) and to a greater extent N. tabacum at 10% concentration were the most effective botanicals and rated parallel for effectiveness in treated crop and had the least aphid's damage and enhanced yield across all the season followed by C. album and A. sativum relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“on canola (B. napus) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“The toxicity of botanicals differed significantly depending upon the treatment applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe spray enhanced canola yield relative to untreated control.

Treatment
A. verae0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The A. vera (Aloeaceae) and to a greater extent N. tabacum at 10% concentration were the most effective botanicals and rated parallel for effectiveness in treated crop and had the least aphid's damage and enhanced yield across all the season followed by C. album and A. sativum relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“on canola (B. napus) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco spray enhanced canola yield relative to untreated control.

Treatment
N. tabacum at 10% concentratione0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The A. vera (Aloeaceae) and to a greater extent N. tabacum at 10% concentration were the most effective botanicals and rated parallel for effectiveness in treated crop and had the least aphid's damage and enhanced yield across all the season followed by C. album and A. sativum relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“on canola (B. napus) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–716 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Aloe as a prospective integrated pest management botanical pesticide.

Treatment
A. verae0
Outcome
use them in an integrated pest management systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“performances of A. vera and N. tabacum as botanical pesticides were observed the best in reducing pest and seed damage, as these did not induce any adverse effect on plant and showed that there is a prospective to use them in an integrated pest management system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“on canola (B. napus) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–716 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend tobacco as a prospective integrated pest management botanical pesticide.

Treatment
N. tabacume0
Outcome
use them in an integrated pest management systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“performances of A. vera and N. tabacum as botanical pesticides were observed the best in reducing pest and seed damage, as these did not induce any adverse effect on plant and showed that there is a prospective to use them in an integrated pest management system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“on canola (B. napus) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–716 · show in text ↑

Nicotiana tabacum · pest · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Nicotiana tabacum · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.