Paper · 2012 · Journal of Biotechnology & Biomaterials

Isolation of Nucleotide Binding Site (NBS)-Leucine Rich Repeat (LRR) Resistant Gene Analogs (Rgas) In Arabica Coffee (Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)

Deepak Kumar

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cloning of resistance gene analogues against diverse pathogens from variety of plants in last decade has revealed that many of them share high level of conserved sequence motifs. The conserved backbone of amino acid motifs present in Nucleotide Binding Site (NBS) domain makes it possible to isolate resistance gene analogues by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with degenerate primers. Oligo-nucleotide primers combinations that target conserve motif of NBS domain as mentioned in earlier studies were used to amplify resistance gene analogues from Coffea arabica (S.288). PCR product amplified from genomic DNA as well as cDNA were cloned and sequenced. In the present study amplified resistance gene analogues from C.arabica genomic DNA and cDNA using Ploop-cof and GLPL-cof primers were cloned, sequenced using T7 / SP6 primers, analyzed at NCBI/SGN Nucleotide Data Bank. Analysis of these RGA leads to the understanding that difference in expression profile might be due to the difference present at sequence level of Resistant Gene Analogs (RGA) isolated from DNA and cDNA. Analysis also revealed presence of high level similarity at their sequences. Seven RGA isolated from genomic DNA of S.288 using non-degenerate primers, eleven more RGA were isolated from S.288 genomic DNA with degenerate oligo-nucleotide primers and thirty two RGA isolated from cDNA of S.288. Fifteen RGA clones isolated from cDNA prepared from rust race I infected leaf sample for 24 hours. BLASTN result showed these C.arabica RGA has a high level of similarity with C.canephora RGA. This confirm the integrity maintained among RGA even it was isolated from different coffee variety which has difference at there genome (C.arabica 2n= 44 and C.canephora 2n= 22). RGA isolated which has below 475 bp or above 530 bp in size along with both primer sequences in their end has either no match with any RGA or they match with microsatellite. There is one independent sequence from genomic DNA and four independent sequences from cDNA which has not given any BLASTN result, these sequences has primer sequence with them that indicates these may be belong to new type of RGA. The RGA reported in current study are mainly from the class A type of RGA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven RGA were isolated from S.288 genomic DNA using non-degenerate primers.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Material
S.288e1
Treatment
non-degenerate primerse1
Outcome
RGAe1
Value
Sevene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seven RGA isolated from genomic DNA of S.288 using non-degenerate primers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven more RGA were isolated from S.288 genomic DNA using degenerate primers.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Material
S.288e2
Treatment
degenerate oligo-nucleotide primerse2
Outcome
RGAe2
Value
elevene2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“eleven more RGA were isolated from S.288 genomic DNA with degenerate oligo-nucleotide primers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-two RGA were isolated from cDNA of S.288.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Material
cDNA of S.288e3
Outcome
RGAe3
Value
thirty twoe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e3

“thirty two RGA isolated from cDNA of S.288”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1371 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen RGA clones were isolated from cDNA of rust race I infected leaves sampled 24 hours after infection.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Organ / stage
leafe4
Treatment
rust race I infected leaf sample for 24 hourse4
Interactor
rust race Ie4pathogen
Outcome
RGA clonese4
Value
Fifteene4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fifteen RGA clones isolated from cDNA prepared from rust race I infected leaf sample for 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C.arabica RGA showed a high level of similarity with C.canephora RGA by BLASTN.

Taxon
C.arabicaCoffea arabicae5
Outcome
high level of similaritye5
Comparator
C.canephora RGAe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e5

“BLASTN result showed these C.arabica RGA has a high level of similarity with C.canephora RGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1564 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RGA of length below 475 bp or above 530 bp had either no match with any RGA or matched microsatellites.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Outcome
RGAe6
Value
below 475 bp or above 530 bpe6
Qualifier
has either no match with any RGA or they match with microsatellitee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“RGA isolated which has below 475 bp or above 530 bp in size along with both primer sequences in their end has either no match with any RGA or they match with microsatellite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One independent sequence from genomic DNA gave no BLASTN result.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Outcome
independent sequencee7
Value
onee7
Qualifier
which has not given any BLASTN resulte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“There is one independent sequence from genomic DNA and four independent sequences from cDNA which has not given any BLASTN result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2048 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four independent sequences from cDNA gave no BLASTN result.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Outcome
independent sequencese7
Value
foure7
Qualifier
which has not given any BLASTN resulte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“There is one independent sequence from genomic DNA and four independent sequences from cDNA which has not given any BLASTN result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2048 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some of the unmatched sequences may belong to a new type of RGA.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Outcome
new type of RGAe5
Qualifier
primer sequence with them that indicatese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e5

“these sequences has primer sequence with them that indicates these may be belong to new type of RGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2149 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RGA reported in this study are mainly of the class A type.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Outcome
RGAe6
Qualifier
mainly from the class A typee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“The RGA reported in current study are mainly from the class A type of RGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2151–2224 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A difference in expression profile might be due to sequence-level differences between RGA isolated from DNA and cDNA.

Taxon
Coffea ArabicaCoffea arabicat0
Outcome
difference in expression profilee7
Qualifier
difference present at sequence levele7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(Coffea Arabica L. Cv S.288)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“Analysis of these RGA leads to the understanding that difference in expression profile might be due to the difference present at sequence level of Resistant Gene Analogs (RGA) isolated from DNA and cDNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1077 · show in text ↑