Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Ecology

Shoot-level biomass allocation is affected by shoot type in Fagus sylvatica

Benjamín Jarčuška; Rubén Milla

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study aims (i) to examine if recently reported interspecific shoot-level biomass allocational trade-offs, i.e. isometric trade-offs between leaf mass (LM) and stem mass (SM) and between leaf size and leaf number, hold intraspecifically and (ii) to explore whether those scaling relationships are independent of shoot type (i.e. long vs. short shoots). In order to address our questions, we used Fagus sylvatica saplings growing under a broad light range that were sampled in the Western Carpathians Mountains (Slovakia). We found that: (i) intraspecific shoot-level biomass allocational trade-offs differ from those reported interspecifically and that (ii) long and short shoots differ in biomass allocation scaling coefficients. Allometric relationships with slopes statistically smaller than 1.0 or higher than −1.0, were found between SM and LM and between mean leafing intensity and individual leaf mass, respectively, in long shoots. In contrast, isometric scaling was found in short shoots. This suggests that leaf mass in short shoots is unaffected by shoot stem mass, in contrast to long shoots. Short shoots also had a larger fraction of biomass allocated to leaves. Beech shoots, as has been observed in other shoot dimorphic species, are specialized, with short shoots specializing in carbon gain and long shoots in space acquisition. A greater shift in LM than in SM among species during speciation shifting from allometric intraspecific relationships to an isometric interspecific scaling relationship between those traits could explain the discrepancies between the outputs of the present intraspecific study and others similar studies. This study draws attention to the importance of considering shoot types in future studies dealing with allocation rules in species with dimorphic shoots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intraspecific shoot-level biomass allocational trade-offs in Fagus sylvatica differ from those reported interspecifically.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticat0
Outcome
shoot-level biomass allocational trade-offse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“intraspecific shoot-level biomass allocational trade-offs differ from those reported interspecifically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–654 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long and short shoots of Fagus sylvatica differ in biomass allocation scaling coefficients.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticat0
Organ / stage
long and short shootse0
Outcome
biomass allocation scaling coefficientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“long and short shoots differ in biomass allocation scaling coefficients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–740 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In long shoots allometric relationships with slopes smaller than 1.0 or higher than -1.0 were found between stem mass and leaf mass and between mean leafing intensity and individual leaf mass.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticat0
Organ / stage
long shootse0
Outcome
Allometric relationshipse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Allometric relationships with slopes statistically smaller than 1.0 or higher than −1.0, were found between SM and LM and between mean leafing intensity and individual leaf mass, respectively, in long shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isometric scaling was found in short shoots.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticat0
Organ / stage
short shootse0
Outcome
isometric scalinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“isometric scaling was found in short shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short shoots had a larger fraction of biomass allocated to leaves.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticat0
Organ / stage
Short shootse0
Outcome
fraction of biomass allocated to leavese0
Direction
largere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Short shoots also had a larger fraction of biomass allocated to leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beech shoots are specialized, short shoots for carbon gain and long shoots for space acquisition.

Taxon
Beeche0
Outcome
specializede0
Qualifier
short shoots specializing in carbon gain and long shoots in space acquisitione0

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Beech shoots, as has been observed in other shoot dimorphic species, are specialized, with short shoots specializing in carbon gain and long shoots in space acquisition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1356 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A greater shift in leaf mass than stem mass among species during speciation could explain the discrepancies between this intraspecific study and interspecific studies.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticat0
Outcome
discrepancies between the outputs of the present intraspecific study and others similar studiese1
Qualifier
A greater shift in LM than in SM among species during speciatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“A greater shift in LM than in SM among species during speciation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“could explain the discrepancies between the outputs of the present intraspecific study and others similar studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1661 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors stress the importance of considering shoot types in future allocation studies of species with dimorphic shoots.

Taxon
species with dimorphic shootse0
Outcome
considering shoot types in future studiese0

Verbatim

t0

“Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“importance of considering shoot types in future studies dealing with allocation rules in species with dimorphic shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1815 · show in text ↑