Abstract
To study the relation between the air temperture in the observation field and barley field is very important when the air temperature at the weather station is applied on the crop cultivation.This study was caried in the experiment field of the branch of industrial meteoralogy section at Owada-cho, Saitama prefecture.We observed the air temperature in the observation field and barley field on the same height with it to compare with them.The relation between the air temperature (X) in the observation field at 10 o'clock from February to June and that (Y) in the barley field is shown as the following formula. (cf. figare 1.)Y=0.5+X+5×10-6e0.58xmean error ±0.7°CAn error of the air temperature in the barley field calculated by this formula is shown as follows in each monthFebruary ±0.4°C March ±0.6°C April ±0.8°C May ±0.9°C June ±0.6°CWe found from Fig 1. that the relation between the air temperature in the observation field and barley field change with the growth of barley.Next we compared with the various air temperature in the observation field and barley field from May 1st. to June 6th. The results are as follows; (cf. figure 2).Minimum temperature in clearY=1.08X-1.8 ±0.7°CMinimum temperature in cloudy or rainyY=1.26X-3.6 ±0.4°CMaximum temperature in clearY=1.17X-0.6 ±0.6Maximum temperature in cloudy or rainyY=1.1X-0.2 ±1.2Diurnal range, clear Y=1.38X ±0.9°CDiurnal range, cloudy or rainyY=0.04+0.98X ±0.5°C10 o'clock clear Y=0.05±1.1X ±0.7°C10 o'clock clear Y=1.9+0.9X ±0.2°CFrom the above results we found that the air temperature in the barley field was clearly higher than that in the observation field except minimum temperature and diurnal range of the air temperature was exceedingly larger in the barley field than the observation field. The mean error of the air temperature in the barley field that was calculated by above formula was within 1°C.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The February to June 10 o’clock relationship between observation and barley field temperatures had mean error ±0.7°C.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Outcome
- mean errore0
- Value
- ±0.7°Ce0
- Comparator
- observation fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The relation between the air temperature (X) in the observation field at 10 o'clock from February to June and that (Y) in the barley field is shown as the following formula. (cf. figare 1.)Y=0.5+X+5×10-6e0.58xmean error ±0.7°C”
Claim · model-written summary
The relation between observation field and barley field temperature changed with barley growth.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Organ / stage
- growth of barleye0
- Outcome
- relation between the air temperature in the observation field and barley fielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the relation between the air temperature in the observation field and barley field change with the growth of barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley field air temperature was clearly higher than observation field temperature except for minimum temperature.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Outcome
- air temperature in the barley fielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- except minimum temperaturee0
- Comparator
- observation fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the air temperature in the barley field was clearly higher than that in the observation field except minimum temperature”
Claim · model-written summary
The diurnal air temperature range was much larger in the barley field than in the observation field.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Outcome
- diurnal range of the air temperaturee0
- Direction
- largere0
- Comparator
- observation fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“diurnal range of the air temperature was exceedingly larger in the barley field than the observation field”
Claim · model-written summary
The mean error of calculated barley field air temperature was within 1°C.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Outcome
- mean error of the air temperature in the barley fielde0
- Value
- 1°Ce0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean error of the air temperature in the barley field that was calculated by above formula was within 1°C”