Paper · 2014 · IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science

Effectiveness of Trichogramma chilonis against Sugarcane inter node borer

A. Padmasri; M. Sudh rani

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

, were made in one plot in regional sugarcane research station ,Rudrur for biological control of internode shoot borers in sugarcane and compared with control plot .Perusal of data revealed that an average percent intensity of inter node shoot borer damage decreased to 70.70 and 53.87 per cent in 2011 and 2012 respectively and average percent incidence of inter node shoot borer damage decreased to 64.92 and 49.66 per cent in 2011 and 2012 respectively. Population of C. sacchariphagus indicus showed negative correlation with increase in number of parasitized eggs of T. chilonis, which indicates that it can be successfully used for the suppression of sugarcane Inter node shoot borer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internode borer damage intensity decreased to 70.70 percent in 2011.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Trichogramma chilonist0
Interactor
inter node shoot borere0pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma chilonisTrichogramma chilonist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
intensity of inter node shoot borer damagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
70.70e0
Qualifier
2011e0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an average percent intensity of inter node shoot borer damage decreased to 70.70 and 53.87 per cent in 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–324 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugarcane and compared with control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trichogramma chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internode borer damage intensity decreased to 53.87 percent in 2012.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Trichogramma chilonist0
Interactor
inter node shoot borere0pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma chilonisTrichogramma chilonist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
intensity of inter node shoot borer damagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
53.87 per cente0
Qualifier
2012e0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an average percent intensity of inter node shoot borer damage decreased to 70.70 and 53.87 per cent in 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–324 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugarcane and compared with control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trichogramma chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internode borer damage incidence decreased to 64.92 percent in 2011.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Trichogramma chilonist0
Interactor
inter node shoot borere0pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma chilonisTrichogramma chilonist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of inter node shoot borer damagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
64.92e0
Qualifier
2011e0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average percent incidence of inter node shoot borer damage decreased to 64.92 and 49.66 per cent in 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–455 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugarcane and compared with control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trichogramma chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internode borer damage incidence decreased to 49.66 percent in 2012.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Trichogramma chilonist0
Interactor
inter node shoot borere0pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma chilonisTrichogramma chilonist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of inter node shoot borer damagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
49.66 per cente0
Qualifier
2012e0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average percent incidence of inter node shoot borer damage decreased to 64.92 and 49.66 per cent in 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–455 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugarcane and compared with control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trichogramma chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borer population was negatively correlated with parasitized Trichogramma eggs.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Interactor
C. sacchariphagus indicuse0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Population of C. sacchariphagus indicuse0
Direction
negative correlatione0
Qualifier
number of parasitized eggs of T. chilonise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population of C. sacchariphagus indicus showed negative correlation with increase in number of parasitized eggs of T. chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“suppression of sugarcane Inter node shoot borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–689 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude T. chilonis can suppress sugarcane internode borer.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Interactor
Inter node shoot borere0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
successfully used for the suppression of sugarcane Inter node shoot borere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it can be successfully used for the suppression of sugarcane Inter node shoot borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“T. chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–583 · show in text ↑

Trichogramma chilonis · disease · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichogramma chilonis · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.