Paper · 2015 · Pakistan Journal of Zoology

Field application of Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) for the management of sugarcane borers.

Ahmad-Ur-Rahman Saljoqi; Muhammad Salim; Sadur-Rehman; et al.

19
claims
79
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

These studies were conducted at farmer's fields in Mardan district during the cropping season 2008- 2009 to investigate the efficacy and potentiality of inundative and inoculative release methods of Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) for the management of sugarcane borers. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design. There were three treatments and four replications in each treatment. The data revealed that both inundative and inoculative release methods of T. chilonis were more effective as compared with the control throughout the entire growing season. Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively. This was followed by Inoculative release method, where 6.75 and 10.00 mean percent infestation was recorded in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively. Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively. The data further revealed that inundative release method of T. chilonis in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops also effectively controlled Acigona steniellus (Hamp) with minimum borer's infestation by recording 3.25 and 3.37 mean percent infestations in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively. It was followed by the plots where T. chilonis were released as inoculative release method, where 4.87 and 6.25 mean percent infestation was recorded in sugarcane plant and ratoon crop respectively. Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%). The data further showed that no Scirpophaga nivella Fabric infestation was recorded in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops. Maximum yield of sugarcane was recorded in both plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane in plots treated with inundative release method (101.5t/ha in plant crop and 69.25 t/ha in ratoon crop) followed by inoculative release method (95.84t/ha in plant crop and 63.14t/ha in ratoon crop). The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant sugarcane borer infestation under Inundative release method of T. chilonis was 3.50.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant crope2
Treatment
Inundative release method of T. chilonise0
Interactor
Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen)Chilo infuscatelluse0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.50e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ratoon sugarcane borer infestation under Inundative release method of T. chilonis was 6.50.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
Inundative release method of T. chilonise0
Interactor
Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen)Chilo infuscatelluse0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.50e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant sugarcane borer infestation under Inoculative release method was 6.75.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant crope2
Treatment
Inoculative release methode0
Interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestatione0
Value
6.75e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was followed by Inoculative release method, where 6.75 and 10.00 mean percent infestation was recorded in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ratoon sugarcane borer infestation under Inoculative release method was 10.00.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
Inoculative release methode0
Interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestatione0
Value
10.00e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was followed by Inoculative release method, where 6.75 and 10.00 mean percent infestation was recorded in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant sugarcane borer infestation under control plots was 7.87.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant crope2
Treatment
control plotse0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
7.87e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ratoon sugarcane borer infestation under control plots was 12.75.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
control plotse0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
12.75e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant sugarcane borer infestation under inundative release method of T. chilonis was 3.25.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant crope2
Treatment
inundative release method of T. chilonise0
Interactor
Acigona steniellus (Hamp)e0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
borer's infestatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.25e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data further revealed that inundative release method of T. chilonis in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops also effectively controlled Acigona steniellus (Hamp) with minimum borer's infestation by recording 3.25 and 3.37 mean percent infestations in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ratoon sugarcane borer infestation under inundative release method of T. chilonis was 3.37.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
inundative release method of T. chilonise0
Interactor
Acigona steniellus (Hamp)e0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
borer's infestatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.37e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data further revealed that inundative release method of T. chilonis in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops also effectively controlled Acigona steniellus (Hamp) with minimum borer's infestation by recording 3.25 and 3.37 mean percent infestations in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant sugarcane borer infestation under inoculative release method was 4.87.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant crope2
Treatment
inoculative release methode0
Interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestatione0
Value
4.87e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was followed by the plots where T. chilonis were released as inoculative release method, where 4.87 and 6.25 mean percent infestation was recorded in sugarcane plant and ratoon crop respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ratoon sugarcane borer infestation under inoculative release method was 6.25.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
inoculative release methode0
Interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestatione0
Value
6.25e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was followed by the plots where T. chilonis were released as inoculative release method, where 4.87 and 6.25 mean percent infestation was recorded in sugarcane plant and ratoon crop respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant sugarcane borer infestation under Control plots was 7.27%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant crope2
Treatment
Control plotse0
Interactor
A. stenielluse0pest
Outcome
A. steniellus infestatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ratoon sugarcane borer infestation under Control plots was 7.65%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
Control plotse0
Interactor
A. stenielluse0pest
Outcome
A. steniellus infestatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum infestation was recorded in control plots with mean percent infestation of 7.87 and 12.75 in sugarcane plant and ratoon crops respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inundative release method of T. chilonis was found the most effective technique against Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) infestation in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops with minimum mean percent infestation of 3.50 and 6.50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No Scirpophaga nivella infestation was found in plant and ratoon sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Interactor
Scirpophaga nivella FabricScirpophaga nivellae0pest
Outcome
no Scirpophaga nivella Fabric infestatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Scirpophaga nivella
Scirpophaga nivella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data further showed that no Scirpophaga nivella Fabric infestation was recorded in both sugarcane plant and ratoon crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

inundative release method gave 101.5t/ha sugarcane yield in the plant crop.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
plant crope0
Treatment
inundative release methode0
Outcome
yield of sugarcanee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
101.5t/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield of sugarcane was recorded in both plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane in plots treated with inundative release method (101.5t/ha in plant crop and 69.25 t/ha in ratoon crop) followed by inoculative release method (95.84t/ha in plant crop and 63.14t/ha in ratoon crop).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–2139 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

inundative release method gave 69.25 t/ha sugarcane yield in the ratoon crop.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
inundative release methode0
Outcome
yield of sugarcanee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
69.25 t/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield of sugarcane was recorded in both plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane in plots treated with inundative release method (101.5t/ha in plant crop and 69.25 t/ha in ratoon crop) followed by inoculative release method (95.84t/ha in plant crop and 63.14t/ha in ratoon crop).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–2139 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

inoculative release method gave 95.84t/ha sugarcane yield in the plant crop.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
plant crope0
Treatment
inoculative release methode0
Outcome
yield of sugarcanee0
Value
95.84t/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield of sugarcane was recorded in both plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane in plots treated with inundative release method (101.5t/ha in plant crop and 69.25 t/ha in ratoon crop) followed by inoculative release method (95.84t/ha in plant crop and 63.14t/ha in ratoon crop).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–2139 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

inoculative release method gave 63.14t/ha sugarcane yield in the ratoon crop.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope0
Treatment
inoculative release methode0
Outcome
yield of sugarcanee0
Value
63.14t/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield of sugarcane was recorded in both plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane in plots treated with inundative release method (101.5t/ha in plant crop and 69.25 t/ha in ratoon crop) followed by inoculative release method (95.84t/ha in plant crop and 63.14t/ha in ratoon crop).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–2139 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

control gave 91.14 t/ha sugarcane yield in the plant crop.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
plant crope2
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
yield of sugarcanee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
91.14 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

control gave 58.33 t/ha sugarcane yield in the ratoon crop.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope2
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
yield of sugarcanee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
58.33 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest yield of sugarcane was recorded in control (91.14 t/ha and 58.33 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plots showed maximum A. steniellus infestation in plant crop (7.27%) and ratoon crop (7.65%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1730 · show in text ↑

Trichogramma chilonis · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichogramma chilonis · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.