Paper · 2025 · International Journal on Food Agriculture and Natural Resources

The Effect Of NPK Fertilizer Doses And Biofertilizers On The Growth Of Sugar Cane Chips Bud (Saccharum Officinarum L.) Seedlings

Fika Febridayanti; Setiyono Setiyono; Oria Alit Farisi; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The need of sugar cane for sugar production continues to increase yearly as human population increasing. Based on Central Bureau of Statistics, sugar cane production in Indonesia grew by 3.54% per year. However, this growth is not sufficient to meet the sugar demand of 2.70 million tons. The cause of Indonesia's low sugar production can be seen from the on-farm side, namely seed preparation. Preparing seeds using conventional methods (mules) affects the seeding time because it takes 6 months for one planting period. The experimental design was carried out using the basic pattern of a Completely Randomized Factorial Design consisting of two factors with three replications. Factor I, namely the dose of NPK inorganic fertilizer (16:16:16) and Factor II, namely the dose of Sinarbio biological fertilizer. The results of the research were (1) The interaction between the treatment of NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer doses on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had a significant effect on shoot length and an insignificant effect on the variables number of leaves, stem diameter, number of tillers, root volume, root wet weight and root dry weight. (2) The effect of NPK fertilizer dosage on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had no significant effect on all observed variables except root wet weight and number of tillers. (3) The effect of biofertilizer dosage on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had no significant effect on all observed variables except root volume.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer doses had a significant effect on sugarcane seedling shoot length.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer dosese1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction between the treatment of NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer doses on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had a significant effect on shoot length and an insignificant effect on the variables number of leaves, stem diameter, number of tillers, root volume, root wet weight and root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of NPK and biofertilizer doses had an insignificant effect on number of leaves, stem diameter and number of tillers of sugarcane seedlings.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer dosese1
Outcome
number of leaves, stem diameter, number of tillerse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction between the treatment of NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer doses on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had a significant effect on shoot length and an insignificant effect on the variables number of leaves, stem diameter, number of tillers, root volume, root wet weight and root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of NPK and biofertilizer doses had an insignificant effect on root volume, root wet weight and root dry weight of sugarcane seedlings.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer dosese1
Outcome
root volume, root wet weight and root dry weighte1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The interaction between the treatment of NPK fertilizer doses and biofertilizer doses on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had a significant effect on shoot length and an insignificant effect on the variables number of leaves, stem diameter, number of tillers, root volume, root wet weight and root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizer dosage had no significant effect on the observed variables of sugarcane seedlings, except root wet weight and number of tillers.

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
NPK fertilizer dosagee3
Outcome
observed variablese3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
except root wet weight and number of tillerse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The effect of NPK fertilizer dosage on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had no significant effect on all observed variables except root wet weight and number of tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer dosage had no significant effect on the observed variables of sugarcane seedlings, except root volume.

Taxon
sugarcanee4
Treatment
biofertilizer dosagee4
Outcome
observed variablese4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Qualifier
except root volumee4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The effect of biofertilizer dosage on the growth of sugarcane bud chip seedlings had no significant effect on all observed variables except root volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1508 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 54 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 312 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.