Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation with B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at 135 kg ha-1 P2O5 gave the maximum stalk yield of sugarcane.

A claim from Inoculation With Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated With the Reduction of Phosphate Fertilization in Sugarcane · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at 135 kg ha-1 P2O5 gave the maximum stalk yield of sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
inoculation of B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at the dose of 135 kg ha-1 P2O5e4
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise4symbiont
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense4symbiont
Outcome
maximum stalk yielde4
Direction
maximume4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reduction of Phosphate Fertilization in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–112
e4

“maximum stalk yield was obtained with inoculation of B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at the dose of 135 kg ha-1 P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1867

Title

Inoculation With Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated With the Reduction of Phosphate Fertilization in Sugarcane

Poliana Aparecida Leonel Rosa; Emariane Satin Mortinho; Arshad Jalal; et al. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2020. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2020.00032

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-7e640152d2e94eca0c1882b6735fa43b631717902d76347be4dfc1769b85f505 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Bacillus doses did not differ in sugarcane yield.

    Biological control of phytoparasitic nematodes in sugarcane fields · 2022 · compared with doses

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Bacillus subtilis changed tillers count to 165.32%.

    Strategies for managing of lesion nematode (Pratylenchus zeae) in sugarcane fields · 2025

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    A. brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens co-inoculation at 135 kg ha−1 P2O5 increased stem productivity by 42%.

    Technological Quality of Sugarcane Inoculated with Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Residual Effect of Phosphorus Rates · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens enhanced number of tillers by 161.5% in sugarcane.

    Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field · 2020

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Bacterial inoculation increased RB72454 stalk yield similarly to nitrogen fertilization in plant-cane and first ratoon harvests.

    Inoculation of sugarcane with diazotrophic bacteria · 2014 · compared with fertilization with 120 kg ha-1 N

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Integrated consortium and NPK positively affected growth, yield, nutrient uptake, and sugar yield.

    Soil quality parameters vis-a-vis growth and yield attributes of sugarcane as influenced by integration of microbial consortium with NPK fertilizers · 2020

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    A. brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens co-inoculation at 135 kg ha−1 P2O5 increased stem productivity by 42%.

    Technological Quality of Sugarcane Inoculated with Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Residual Effect of Phosphorus Rates · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. positive
    Inoculation with 60 and 90 kg N ha−1 increased sugarcane stalk yield, dry matter, nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency.

    Interaction between diazotrophic bacteria and N-fertilizer doses on sugarcane crop · 2018

    Same directionCited by this paper

  5. no effect
    Neither inoculum changed shoot and root dry matter accumulation.

    Endophytic bacteria affect sugarcane physiology without changing plant growth · 2015 · compared with control condition

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Experimental G. diazotrophicus inoculation reduced sugarcane glycoprotein production.

    Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, a sugarcane endophyte, inhibits xanthan production by sugarcane-invadingXanthomonas albilineans · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    The interaction of NPK and biofertilizer doses had an insignificant effect on number of leaves, stem diameter and number of tillers of sugarcane seedlings.

    The Effect Of NPK Fertilizer Doses And Biofertilizers On The Growth Of Sugar Cane Chips Bud (Saccharum Officinarum L.) Seedlings · 2025

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Inoculation increased stem yield of RB867515 at Sapucaia by 22.3 Mg ha−1 compared with the control.

    Yield of sugarcane varieties and their sugar quality grown in different soil types and inoculated with a diazotrophic bacteria consortium · 2017 · compared with control

    Same direction

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.