Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Strategies for managing of lesion nematode (Pratylenchus zeae) in sugarcane fields

J Jayakumar; T Senthilkumar; V Ravichandran; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lesion nematodes cause significant yield losses in sugarcane, with global reductions ranging from 10 to 40%. Identifying effective bioagents for soil application is critical to improving sugarcane production. Misdiagnosing nematode infestations as nutrient deficiencies or soil toxicity can limit nutrient availability to plants, exacerbating the problem. To address the challenges posed by lesion nematodes in sugarcane, the present investigations was conducted in a farmer’s field under the sugarcane variety CoC 25 in Vriddhachalam, Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu, India. The study evaluated the efficacy of talc-based fungal antagonists, including Trichoderma viride, T. asperellum, Purpureocillium lilacinum, T. harzianum, Pochonia chlamydosporia, T. reesei and Clonostachys frosea as well as bacterial antagonist such as Bacillus firmus, B. subtilis and Lysinibacillus fusiformis against lesion nematode Pratylenchus zeae. These biocontrol agents were applied at 2.5 kg/ha and compared with the standard recommendation of carbofuran applied at 33 kg/ha. All tested fungal and bacterial antagonists significantly reduced the soil population density of lesion nematode. In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%). Similarly, the bacterial antagonist, Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 71.3% and improved germination (85.22%), tillers count (165.32%), commercial cane sugar content (12.30%), cane yield (118.60%) and sugar yield (16.66%). In the second year, combining P. lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha with Fluensulphone 2% GR at 10 kg/ha resulted in a reduction of lesion nematode populations by 81.23% and achieved a maximum cane yield of 118.3 t/ha. The application of P. lilacinum proved to be highly effective in reducing nematode populations and is recommended for inclusion in an integrated nematode management module.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested fungal and bacterial antagonists significantly reduced lesion nematode soil density.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
fungal and bacterial antagonistse0
Interactor
lesion nematodee0pest
Outcome
soil population density of lesion nematodee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“All tested fungal and bacterial antagonists significantly reduced the soil population density of lesion nematode.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinum changed nematode populations to 74.3%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Second interactor
P.lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
74.3%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinum changed germination to 84.26%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
P.lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
84.26%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinum changed tillers count to 166.62%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
P.lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tillers counte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
166.62%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinum changed commercial cane sugar percentage to 12.80%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
P.lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
commercial cane sugar percentagee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
12.80%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinum changed cane yield to 120.50%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
P.lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
120.50%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinum changed sugar yield to 16.82%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
P.lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
16.82%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis changed nematode populations to 71.3%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
71.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similarly, the bacterial antagonist, Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 71.3% and improved germination (85.22%), tillers count (165.32%), commercial cane sugar content (12.30%), cane yield (118.60%) and sugar yield (16.66%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis changed germination to 85.22%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
85.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similarly, the bacterial antagonist, Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 71.3% and improved germination (85.22%), tillers count (165.32%), commercial cane sugar content (12.30%), cane yield (118.60%) and sugar yield (16.66%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis changed tillers count to 165.32%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tillers counte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
165.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similarly, the bacterial antagonist, Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 71.3% and improved germination (85.22%), tillers count (165.32%), commercial cane sugar content (12.30%), cane yield (118.60%) and sugar yield (16.66%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis changed commercial cane sugar content to 12.30%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
commercial cane sugar contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
12.30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similarly, the bacterial antagonist, Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 71.3% and improved germination (85.22%), tillers count (165.32%), commercial cane sugar content (12.30%), cane yield (118.60%) and sugar yield (16.66%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis changed cane yield to 118.60%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
118.60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similarly, the bacterial antagonist, Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 71.3% and improved germination (85.22%), tillers count (165.32%), commercial cane sugar content (12.30%), cane yield (118.60%) and sugar yield (16.66%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis changed sugar yield to 16.66%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
16.66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similarly, the bacterial antagonist, Bacillus subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 71.3% and improved germination (85.22%), tillers count (165.32%), commercial cane sugar content (12.30%), cane yield (118.60%) and sugar yield (16.66%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded 81.23% for lesion nematode populations.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P. lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha with Fluensulphone 2% GR at 10 kg/hae0
Interactor
lesion nematodee0pest
Second interactor
P. lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
lesion nematode populationse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
81.23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the second year, combining P. lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha with Fluensulphone 2% GR at 10 kg/ha resulted in a reduction of lesion nematode populations by 81.23% and achieved a maximum cane yield of 118.3 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–2002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded 118.3 t/ha for cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P. lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha with Fluensulphone 2% GR at 10 kg/hae0
Interactor
P. lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
118.3 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the second year, combining P. lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha with Fluensulphone 2% GR at 10 kg/ha resulted in a reduction of lesion nematode populations by 81.23% and achieved a maximum cane yield of 118.3 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–2002 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend P. lilacinum for integrated nematode management.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Second interactor
P. lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inclusion in an integrated nematode management modulee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of P. lilacinum proved to be highly effective in reducing nematode populations and is recommended for inclusion in an integrated nematode management module.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2175 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Nematoda · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.