Paper · 2018 · MicrobiologyOpen

Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste

Roberta M. Santos; Saveetha Kandasamy; Everlon Cid Rigobelo

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mineral and organic fertilization can be optimized by using rhizobacteria which increases dry matter, yield, and nutrients in the soil and plant, among the other biological inputs. However, the discovery of single microbes or a consortium that can benefit plants has been a challenge. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus combined with mineral fertilization and sugar and alcohol industry by-products in presprouted and the initial growth phase of sugar cane seedlings. The study was carried out in two phases. Phase 1 included presprouted seedlings with T1 = untreated control, T2 = B. subtilis, T3 = B. pumilus, and T4 = B. subtilis + B. pumilus treatments. Phase 2 included the same treatments with four types of fertilization: F1 = mineral fertilization, F2 = mineral fertilization + vinasse, F3 = mineral fertilization + filter cake, and F4 = mineral fertilization + filter cake compost. Of the phase 1 treatments, T2 (B. subtilis) was the best promoter of root growth and the total dry matter compared to the control with an increase of 23.0% compared to the control. In phase 2, B. pumilus application, increased the total dry matter by 13%, the number of tillers by 37%, and the diameter of the tillers by 48% when combined with mineral fertilization. The combined application of B. subtilis and B. pumilus increased the phosphorus content by 13% in soil treated with mineral fertilization and filter cake compost. The results of the this study strongly suggest that the use of B. subtilis and B. pumilus together with these by-products can improve soil fertility parameters and decrease adverse effects associated with vinasse fertilization, in addition to providing shoot and root growth and providing collective synergy for a high yield of sugarcane production with environmental benefits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis treatment gave the largest increase in root growth and total dry matter of presprouted sugarcane seedlings relative to the control, by 23.0%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B. subtilise1
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise1symbiont
Outcome
root growth and the total dry mattere1
Direction
increasee1
Value
23.0%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“T2 (B. subtilis) was the best promoter of root growth and the total dry matter compared to the control with an increase of 23.0% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pumilus application increased total dry matter of sugarcane by 13% when combined with mineral fertilization.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B. pumilus applicatione2
Interactor
B. pumilusBacillus pumiluse2symbiont
Outcome
total dry mattere2
Direction
increasede2
Value
13%e2
Qualifier
when combined with mineral fertilizatione2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“In phase 2, B. pumilus application, increased the total dry matter by 13%, the number of tillers by 37%, and the diameter of the tillers by 48% when combined with mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pumilus application increased the number of sugarcane tillers by 37% when combined with mineral fertilization.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B. pumilus applicatione2
Interactor
B. pumilusBacillus pumiluse2symbiont
Outcome
the number of tillerse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
37%e2
Qualifier
when combined with mineral fertilizatione2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“In phase 2, B. pumilus application, increased the total dry matter by 13%, the number of tillers by 37%, and the diameter of the tillers by 48% when combined with mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pumilus application increased the diameter of sugarcane tillers by 48% when combined with mineral fertilization.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
B. pumilus applicatione2
Interactor
B. pumilusBacillus pumiluse2symbiont
Outcome
the diameter of the tillerse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
48%e2
Qualifier
when combined with mineral fertilizatione2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“In phase 2, B. pumilus application, increased the total dry matter by 13%, the number of tillers by 37%, and the diameter of the tillers by 48% when combined with mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of B. subtilis and B. pumilus increased soil phosphorus content by 13% in soil treated with mineral fertilization and filter cake compost.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
combined application of B. subtilis and B. pumiluse3
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise3symbiont
Second interactor
B. pumilusBacillus pumiluse3symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus contente3
Direction
increasede3
Value
13%e3
Qualifier
in soil treated with mineral fertilization and filter cake composte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combined application of B. subtilis and B. pumilus increased the phosphorus content by 13% in soil treated with mineral fertilization and filter cake compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining B. subtilis and B. pumilus with these by-products, which they suggest can improve soil fertility parameters and reduce adverse effects of vinasse fertilization.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
soil fertility parameterse4

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results of the this study strongly suggest that the use of B. subtilis and B. pumilus together with these by-products can improve soil fertility parameters and decrease adverse effects associated with vinasse fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1712 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.