Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P.lilacinum changed germination to 84.26%.

A claim from Strategies for managing of lesion nematode (Pratylenchus zeae) in sugarcane fields · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinum changed germination to 84.26%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
P.lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
84.26%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75
e0

“In the first year, sett treatment experiments demonstrated that the application of the fungal antagonist P.lilacinum at 2.5 kg/ha reduced nematode populations by 74.3% compared to the untreated control. This treatment also improved germination (84.26%), tillers count (166.62%), commercial cane sugar percentage (12.80%), cane yield (120.50%) and sugar yield (16.82%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1542

Title

Strategies for managing of lesion nematode (Pratylenchus zeae) in sugarcane fields

J Jayakumar; T Senthilkumar; V Ravichandran; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.6324

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-63a91ec030d283d56626098d69428fcc54b5bb8450f2b4ace1b23429cbcdf5c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Purpureocillium lilacinum · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.