Abstract
The results indicated that the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens was better that minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% and enhanced germination %, number of tillers, commercial cane sugar %, cane yield and sugar yield by 87.2, 161.5, 12.7, 121.4 and 16.4%, respectively. This field experiment was repeated once during 2016–2017 and obtained 74.0% control of lesion nematode with higher yield of 124.4 t/ha in P. fluorescens @ 2.5 kg/ha sett treatment. Simultaneously another field experiment with fungal antagonists Purpureocillium lilacinum and Trichoderma viride @ 2.5 kg/ha were conducted during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017. The P. lilacinum was better than T. viride. During 2016–2017, similar results recorded 70.5% nematode control with cane yield 124.8 t/ha. The results demonstrated that P. fluorescens in combination of neem cake was better that caused the highest reduction in lesion nematode population (74.8%) with the cane yield of 115.8 t/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Interactor
- lesion nematodee0pest
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- lesion nematode populatione0
- Direction
- minimizede0
- Value
- 73.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e0“the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens was better that minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% and enhanced germination %, number of tillers, commercial cane sugar %, cane yield and sugar yield by 87.2, 161.5, 12.7, 121.4 and 16.4%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens enhanced germination by 87.2% in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Outcome
- germination %e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 87.2e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e0“the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens was better that minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% and enhanced germination %, number of tillers, commercial cane sugar %, cane yield and sugar yield by 87.2, 161.5, 12.7, 121.4 and 16.4%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens enhanced number of tillers by 161.5% in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Outcome
- number of tillerse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 161.5e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e0“the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens was better that minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% and enhanced germination %, number of tillers, commercial cane sugar %, cane yield and sugar yield by 87.2, 161.5, 12.7, 121.4 and 16.4%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens enhanced commercial cane sugar by 12.7% in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Outcome
- commercial cane sugar %e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 12.7e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e0“the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens was better that minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% and enhanced germination %, number of tillers, commercial cane sugar %, cane yield and sugar yield by 87.2, 161.5, 12.7, 121.4 and 16.4%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens enhanced cane yield by 121.4% in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 121.4e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e0“the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens was better that minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% and enhanced germination %, number of tillers, commercial cane sugar %, cane yield and sugar yield by 87.2, 161.5, 12.7, 121.4 and 16.4%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens enhanced sugar yield by 16.4% in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 16.4e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e0“the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens was better that minimized lesion nematode population by 73.2% and enhanced germination %, number of tillers, commercial cane sugar %, cane yield and sugar yield by 87.2, 161.5, 12.7, 121.4 and 16.4%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens combined with neem cake gave the highest reduction in lesion nematode population (74.8%) in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens in combination of neem cakee4
- Interactor
- lesion nematodee4pest
- Second interactor
- P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense4biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- lesion nematode populatione4
- Direction
- highest reductione4
- Value
- 74.8%e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e4“P. fluorescens in combination of neem cake was better that caused the highest reduction in lesion nematode population (74.8%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens combined with neem cake gave a cane yield of 115.8 t/ha in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens in combination of neem cakee4
- Outcome
- cane yielde5
- Direction
- increaseinferrede5
- Value
- 115.8 t/hae5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e4“P. fluorescens in combination of neem cake was better that caused the highest reduction in lesion nematode population (74.8%)”
e5“with the cane yield of 115.8 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens at 2.5 kg/ha as seed treatment obtained 74.0% control of lesion nematode in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens @ 2.5 kg/ha sette6
- Interactor
- lesion nematodee6pest
- Second interactor
- P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense6biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- control of lesion nematodee6
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede6
- Value
- 74.0%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e6“obtained 74.0% control of lesion nematode with higher yield of 124.4 t/ha in P. fluorescens @ 2.5 kg/ha sett treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens at 2.5 kg/ha as seed treatment gave a higher yield of 124.4 t/ha in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- P. fluorescens @ 2.5 kg/ha sette6
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 124.4 t/hae6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e6“obtained 74.0% control of lesion nematode with higher yield of 124.4 t/ha in P. fluorescens @ 2.5 kg/ha sett treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Purpureocillium lilacinum was better than Trichoderma viride against lesion nematode in sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Purpureocillium lilacinume1
- Interactor
- Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinume1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- bettere2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Comparator
- Trichoderma viridee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e1“fungal antagonists Purpureocillium lilacinum and Trichoderma viride @ 2.5 kg/ha”
e2“The P. lilacinum was better than T. viride”
Claim · model-written summary
Similar results recorded 70.5% nematode control in sugarcane in 2016–2017.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e3“During 2016–2017, similar results recorded 70.5% nematode control with cane yield 124.8 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Similar results recorded cane yield of 124.8 t/ha in sugarcane in 2016–2017.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
t0“Eco-friendly management of Sugarcane nematode in Field”
e3“During 2016–2017, similar results recorded 70.5% nematode control with cane yield 124.8 t/ha”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
botanical · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.