Abstract
The objective of this research was to evaluate the phytochemical, physicochemical and toxicity profile of ethanol crude extract of L. macrophyllain relation to Artemiasalina L. The Phytochemical analysis of the ethanol crude extract of the barks and stem and physicochemical calculation were performed by methods found in the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia. Phytochemical analysis detected saponins, organic acids, reducing sugars, tannins, anthraquinones, and depsidedepsidone. In relation to the physicochemical parameters, it showed pH = 4.64, due to the occurrence of saponins, organic acids and tannins; lipid = 0.55% indicates that the material presents few lipids of low molecular weight; humidity = 12.09% ± 0.12, relates to a small amount of water, indispensable for non occurrence of development of microorganisms or enzymatic degradation. Waste by incineration is within the pharmacognostic standards of 8.30% ± 0.54.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Bark extract contained saponins, organic acids, and reducing sugars.
- Taxon
- Licania macrophylla
Hymenopus macrophyllust0 - Organ / stage
- barks and steme1
- Outcome
- saponins, organic acids, reducing sugarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phytochemical analysis detected saponins, organic acids, reducing sugars, tannins, anthraquinones, and depsidedepsidone”
e1“the barks and stem”
t0“Licania macrophylla”
Claim · model-written summary
Bark extract contained tannins, anthraquinones, and depsidedepsidone.
- Taxon
- Licania macrophyllaHymenopus macrophyllust0
- Organ / stage
- barks and steme1
- Outcome
- tannins, anthraquinones, and depsidedepsidonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phytochemical analysis detected saponins, organic acids, reducing sugars, tannins, anthraquinones, and depsidedepsidone”
e1“the barks and stem”
t0“Licania macrophylla”
Claim · model-written summary
The extract had pH 4.64.
- Taxon
- Licania macrophyllaHymenopus macrophyllust0
- Outcome
- pHe0
- Value
- 4.64e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it showed pH = 4.64”
t0“Licania macrophylla”
Claim · model-written summary
The extract had 0.55% lipid.
- Taxon
- Licania macrophyllaHymenopus macrophyllust0
- Outcome
- lipide0
- Value
- 0.55%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lipid = 0.55%”
t0“Licania macrophylla”
Claim · model-written summary
The extract had 12.09% ± 0.12 humidity.
- Taxon
- Licania macrophyllaHymenopus macrophyllust0
- Outcome
- humiditye0
- Value
- 12.09% ± 0.12e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“humidity = 12.09% ± 0.12”
t0“Licania macrophylla”
Claim · model-written summary
Incineration residue was 8.30% ± 0.54 and within pharmacognostic standards.
- Taxon
- Licania macrophyllaHymenopus macrophyllust0
- Outcome
- Waste by incineratione0
- Value
- 8.30% ± 0.54e0
- Qualifier
- within the pharmacognostic standardse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Waste by incineration is within the pharmacognostic standards of 8.30% ± 0.54”
t0“Licania macrophylla”