Paper · 1993 · HortTechnology

Components of Sustainable Production Systems for Vegetables-Conserving soil Moisture

Ronald D. Morse

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Conservation tillage systems offer distinct advantages for crop production under erosive and droughty soil conditions. This report contains 4 years of data on the effects of in situ cereal rye and wheat mulches on yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) grown under limited-irrigation, conservation-tillage systems. Three tillage systems were studied: conventional plow-disk (CT); strip tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT). The summers of 1987 and 1990 were characterized by below-average total rain and periods of prolonged (45 days) of dry weather during head enlargement; cabbage yields were highest in the mulched ST and NT plots. In contrast, the 1988 and 1989 growing seasons were above average in total rain and there were no prolonged periods of dry weather. Cabbage yields were unaffected by tillage treatments in 1988, while, in 1989, yields with NT were 65% and 60% lower than with CT and ST, respectively. A combination of abundant rain, soil compaction, and delayed planting retarded plant growth in the 1989 NT plots, resulting in smaller, less-productive plants than in the tilled ST and CT plots. These data show that: 1) conservation tillage and particularly strip tillage systems are viable options for production of cabbage; and 2) rain-irrigation patterns, site selection, and planting dates are major determinants of the relative advantages of conservation tillage compared to conventional tillage systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In dry 1987 and 1990 seasons, cabbage yield was highest in mulched strip and no-tillage plots.

Treatment
mulched ST and NT plotse0
Outcome
cabbage yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
1987 and 1990e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The summers of 1987 and 1990 were characterized by below-average total rain and periods of prolonged (45 days) of dry weather during head enlargement; cabbage yields were highest in the mulched ST and NT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage treatments did not affect cabbage yield in 1988.

Treatment
tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
Cabbage yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
1988e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cabbage yields were unaffected by tillage treatments in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1989 no-tillage cabbage yield was 65% below conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
65%e0
Qualifier
1989e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1989, yields with NT were 65% and 60% lower than with CT and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1989 no-tillage cabbage yield was 60% below strip tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
60%e0
Qualifier
1989e0
Comparator
STe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1989, yields with NT were 65% and 60% lower than with CT and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–267 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rain, compaction and delayed planting retarded growth in 1989 no-tillage cabbage plots.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
retardede0
Qualifier
abundant rain, soil compaction, and delayed plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of abundant rain, soil compaction, and delayed planting retarded plant growth in the 1989 NT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants in 1989 no-tillage plots were smaller and less productive than those in tilled plots.

Outcome
smaller, less-productive plantse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
tilled ST and CT plotse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in smaller, less-productive plants than in the tilled ST and CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–267 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage, especially strip tillage, was judged viable for cabbage production.

Treatment
strip tillage systemse0
Outcome
viable options for production of cabbagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conservation tillage and particularly strip tillage systems are viable options for production of cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1253 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rain-irrigation patterns, site and planting dates determine relative tillage advantages.

Outcome
relative advantages of conservation tillagee0
Qualifier
rain-irrigation patterns, site selection, and planting datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rain-irrigation patterns, site selection, and planting dates are major determinants of the relative advantages of conservation tillage compared to conventional tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–267 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

61 papers: 49 positive, 12 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

tillage · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 17 positive, 15 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.