Paper · 2015 · Journal of Chromatographic Science

Simultaneous HPLC Quantitative Analysis of Nine Bioactive Constituents inScirpus YagaraOhwi. (Cyperaceae)

Jianfang Zhang; Nuoshu Zou; Qiaoli Liang; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The tuber of Scirpus yagara Ohwi. (Cyperaceae) has long been used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Several chemical constituents isolated from it possess a variety of physiologically activities such as anti-inflammatory, antitumor and antioxidant. A simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was developed and validated for the determination of nine active components in tubers and aerial parts of S. yagara. The analysis was performed on a YMC-Pack ODS-A column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, 30 nm) with a multilinear gradient mobile phase of water-formic acid (100 : 0.2, v/v) and methanol. The established HPLC method was validated in terms of linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and stability. All analyzed components were detected in the whole tested samples, and the contents of most components in the aerial parts were even higher than those in the tubers. Moreover, the best harvest period was discovered to be November, which is different from the traditional. The method developed was successfully applied for simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of nine active components in S. yagara.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HPLC method was validated for linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and stability.

Taxon
Scirpus yagara Ohwi.Bolboschoenus yagarae2
Outcome
linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and stabilitye0
Value
nine active componentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bolboschoenus yagara
Bolboschoenus yagara · TaxonGabriel Mayrhofer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The established HPLC method was validated in terms of linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“determination of nine active components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“Scirpus yagara Ohwi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All analyzed components were detected in all tested samples.

Taxon
Scirpus yagara Ohwi.Bolboschoenus yagarae1
Outcome
All analyzed components were detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bolboschoenus yagara
Bolboschoenus yagara · TaxonGabriel Mayrhofer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All analyzed components were detected in the whole tested samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–804 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scirpus yagara Ohwi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most component contents were higher in aerial parts than tubers.

Taxon
Scirpus yagara Ohwi.Bolboschoenus yagarae1
Organ / stage
aerial partse0
Outcome
contents of most componentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
tuberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bolboschoenus yagara
Bolboschoenus yagara · TaxonGabriel Mayrhofer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of most components in the aerial parts were even higher than those in the tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scirpus yagara Ohwi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November was identified as the best harvest period.

Taxon
Scirpus yagara Ohwi.Bolboschoenus yagarae1
Outcome
best harvest periode0
Value
Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bolboschoenus yagara
Bolboschoenus yagara · TaxonGabriel Mayrhofer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best harvest period was discovered to be November, which is different from the traditional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scirpus yagara Ohwi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method was successfully applied for simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of nine components.

Taxon
Scirpus yagara Ohwi.Bolboschoenus yagarae1
Outcome
simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysise0
Value
nine active componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bolboschoenus yagara
Bolboschoenus yagara · TaxonGabriel Mayrhofer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The method developed was successfully applied for simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of nine active components in S. yagara”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scirpus yagara Ohwi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑