Paper · 2013 · HortTechnology

Survey of How Hanging Baskets Influence the Light Environment at Lower Crop Level in Ornamental Greenhouses in Ontario, Canada

David Llewellyn; Youbin Zheng; Mike Dixon

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Hanging basket (HB) production alters the light environment in the lower canopy of ornamental greenhouses by intercepting and altering the spectral quality of incoming light. If shading is sufficiently high, the quality of the lower crops can be reduced. This work investigated changes in light quantity and quality at the lower crop level caused by HB production in Ontario, Canada. Light sampling occurred at three commercial greenhouse facilities throughout the Spring 2012 HB season. The greenhouses represented a range of HB densities (1.8, 2.4, and 3.0 baskets/m 2 ) and different HB canopy architectures (one, two, and three tiers of HBs). Light samples were taken at three fixed locations within each greenhouse facility: outside, HB level, and lower crop level. Photosynthetically active radiation ( PAR ) was logged continuously at each location within each greenhouse environment. Spectral scans were made at each sampling location, within each greenhouse facility, at various times throughout the season to assess how HB production altered the red to far red ratio (R:FR) at lower crop level. As the season progressed, outdoor daily light integrals (DLIs) more than doubled from <20 to >40 mol·m −2 ·d −1 . Light reduction caused by polyethylene films and structural components varied among locations, but remained steady throughout the season, averaging 48.3% for the three locations. As the HB crops matured, the rate of decrease in PAR at lower crop level varied according to facility and HB density with mean reductions of 42.5%, 32.6%, and 37.7% for the one-, two-, and three-tiered facilities, respectively. Mean lower crop level DLIs were all very similar, between 9.4 and 9.9 mol·m −2 ·d −1 . Accordingly, there may be insufficient light below HB canopies to produce high-quality crops of many varieties of bedding plants that are commonly grown in Ontario. The one- and two-tiered systems reduced the R:FR at lower crop level by 14% and 10%, respectively, whereas the three-tiered system caused no reduction. More work is required to determine if the observed far red shift is sufficient to alter crop quality. These case studies provide a backdrop against which to help determine and interpret horticultural management strategies for a variety of greenhouse crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With one-tiered hanging baskets, PAR at lower crop level was reduced by a mean of 42.5% as crops matured.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
PAR at lower crop levele1
Value
42.5%e1

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of decrease in PAR at lower crop level varied according to facility and HB density with mean reductions of 42.5%, 32.6%, and 37.7% for the one-, two-, and three-tiered facilities, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1624 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With two-tiered hanging baskets, PAR at lower crop level was reduced by a mean of 32.6% as crops matured.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
PAR at lower crop levele1
Value
32.6%e1

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of decrease in PAR at lower crop level varied according to facility and HB density with mean reductions of 42.5%, 32.6%, and 37.7% for the one-, two-, and three-tiered facilities, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1624 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With three-tiered hanging baskets, PAR at lower crop level was reduced by a mean of 37.7% as crops matured.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
PAR at lower crop levele1
Value
37.7%e1

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of decrease in PAR at lower crop level varied according to facility and HB density with mean reductions of 42.5%, 32.6%, and 37.7% for the one-, two-, and three-tiered facilities, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1624 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean lower crop level daily light integrals were similar, 9.4 to 9.9 mol m-2 d-1, across facilities.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
lower crop level DLIse2
Value
9.4 and 9.9 mol·m −2 ·d −1e2

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mean lower crop level DLIs were all very similar, between 9.4 and 9.9 mol·m −2 ·d −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1710 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light reduction caused by polyethylene films and structural components averaged 48.3% across the three greenhouse locations.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
Light reduction caused by polyethylene films and structural componentse3
Value
48.3%e3

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e3

“Light reduction caused by polyethylene films and structural components varied among locations, but remained steady throughout the season, averaging 48.3% for the three locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1396 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Insufficient light below hanging basket canopies may limit production of high-quality crops of bedding plants.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
high-quality cropse4
Qualifier
there may be insufficient light below HB canopiese4

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e4

“there may be insufficient light below HB canopies to produce high-quality crops of many varieties of bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1841 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The one-tiered system reduced the red to far red ratio at lower crop level by 14%.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
R:FR at lower crop levele5
Value
14%e5

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e5

“The one- and two-tiered systems reduced the R:FR at lower crop level by 14% and 10%, respectively, whereas the three-tiered system caused no reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two-tiered system reduced the red to far red ratio at lower crop level by 10%.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
R:FR at lower crop levele5
Value
10%e5

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e5

“The one- and two-tiered systems reduced the R:FR at lower crop level by 14% and 10%, respectively, whereas the three-tiered system caused no reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-tiered system caused no reduction in the red to far red ratio at lower crop level.

Taxon
bedding plantse6
Outcome
caused no reductione5

Verbatim

e6

“bedding plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1841 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas the three-tiered system caused no reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2028 · show in text ↑