Paper · 2010 · Northwest Irrigation & Soils Research Laboratory Publications (United States Department of Agriculture)

Rhizoctonia and Bacterial Root Rot in Sugarbeet

C.A. Strausbaugh; Imad A. Eujayl

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Amalgamated Sugar Company production area in southern Idaho and southeastern Oregon suffers considerable losses from root rot in the field. Both Rhizoctonia and bacterial root rots on sugarbeet are common in Treasure Valley and Magic Valley (Fig. 1 and 2), while eastern Idaho fields seem to be relatively root rot free. The yield losses in some Treasure Valley fields can approach or surpass 50%. The growers not only suffer losses in the field, but diseased roots also store and process poorly, leading to additional losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia and bacterial root rots were common in sugarbeet in Treasure Valley and Magic Valley.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
root rotse0
Setting
Treasure Valley and Magic Valleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both Rhizoctonia and bacterial root rots on sugarbeet are common in Treasure Valley and Magic Valley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eastern Idaho fields were relatively free of root rot.

Outcome
root rot freee0
Qualifier
seem to be relativelye0
Setting
eastern Idahoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eastern Idaho fields seem to be relatively root rot free”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot in Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield losses in some Treasure Valley sugarbeet fields approached or exceeded 50%.

Outcome
yield lossese0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
can approach or surpasse0
Setting
Treasure Valleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield losses in some Treasure Valley fields can approach or surpass 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseased sugarbeet roots stored poorly.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
store and process poorlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diseased roots also store and process poorly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑