Paper · 1998 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effects of temporary and permanent soil cover on grape yield and soil chemical and physical properties

A. Klik; J. Rosner; W. Loiskandl

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
35
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Conserving natural resources, especially soil and water, are national goals in Austria. Soil and water quality are inherently linked, therefore enhancing or improving soil quality is a fundamental step towards enhancing or improving water quality. Vineyards near Vienna, Austria, are located on steep (35%) slopes, and soil loss is a major problem. Tillage practices have been designed to reduce soil erosion. We evaluated these tillage practices in terms of each treatment's effectiveness in reducing soil erosion from vineyards. Different amounts of soil cover by manures or clover were investigated, including a bare soil treatment. The impact of each tillage practice on physical, chemical, and biological soil properties and crop (grape) productivity were also investigated. Each tillage practice had been established for eight years. Compared to bare soil treatment, manure and clover cover had a positive impact on soil quality. Also, amount and quality of grapes were greatly enhanced compared to bare soil treatment. At another field site, eight cover crops were evaluated with regard to soil cover, cover crop yield, and water use and redistribution. Significant differences were observed between water use and redistribution among cover crop treatments. A cover crop mixture of Lolium perenne, Festuca arundinacea and Trifolium repens developed high soil cover with low crop water requirement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure cover improved soil quality relative to bare soil.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
positive impacte0
Comparator
bare soil treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to bare soil treatment, manure and clover cover had a positive impact on soil quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover cover improved soil quality relative to bare soil.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
clover covere0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
positive impacte0
Comparator
bare soil treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to bare soil treatment, manure and clover cover had a positive impact on soil quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape amount and quality were enhanced relative to bare soil.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
amount and quality of grapese0
Direction
greatly enhancede0
Comparator
bare soil treatmente0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“Also, amount and quality of grapes were greatly enhanced compared to bare soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop treatments differed significantly in water use and redistribution.

Taxon
cover crope0
Treatment
cover crop treatmentse0
Outcome
water use and redistributione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were observed between water use and redistribution among cover crop treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1264 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Lolium, Festuca, and Trifolium mixture produced high soil cover with low water requirement.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee0
Outcome
high soil cover with low crop water requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A cover crop mixture of Lolium perenne, Festuca arundinacea and Trifolium repens developed high soil cover with low crop water requirement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1404 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.