Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Long-term compost addition had no or limited effects on plant growth and grape quality

A claim from Influence of Long-Term Application of Green Waste Compost on Soil Characteristics and Growth, Yield and Quality of Grape (Vitis viniferaL.) · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term compost addition had no or limited effects on plant growth and grape quality

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
long-term addition of composte1
Outcome
plant growth and grape qualitye1
Qualifier
no or limited effectse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties are one of the main factors affecting the yield and qualitative value of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95
e1

“long-term addition of compost to a vineyard can be beneficial to soil characteristics, including organic matter and nitrate content, and had no or limited effects on plant growth and grape quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–660

Title

Influence of Long-Term Application of Green Waste Compost on Soil Characteristics and Growth, Yield and Quality of Grape (Vitis viniferaL.)

Sergio Mugnai; Elisa Masi; Elisa Azzarello; et al. Compost Science & Utilization 2012. doi:10.1080/1065657x.2012.10737019

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-f3788a72c1a36e182f1fc55a1cd28f6cf04bad3327728ce0f8e95f900f1390e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Compost application improved grape quality overall.

    Deep Placement of Compost into Vineyard Soil Affecting Physical Properties of Soils, Yield and Quality of Grapes · 2022

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Manure cover improved soil quality relative to bare soil.

    Effects of temporary and permanent soil cover on grape yield and soil chemical and physical properties · 1998 · compared with bare soil treatment

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Poultry manure increased grape fruit yield and quality over the control.

    Application of Poultry Manure Influences Thompson Seedless Grape Production and Soil Properties · 1988 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Nutrient solution provided mineral composition meeting viticultural requirements.

    Grapevine fruiting cuttings: validation of an experimental system to study grapevine physiology. I. Main vegetative characteristics · 1998

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Compost allowed substitution of chemical fertilizers without loss of vigor, yield, or fruit quality.

    GROWTH AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF APPLE TREES AND GRAPEVINES IN MUNICIPIAL SOLID-WASTE-AMENDED SOIL · 1995 · compared with chemical fertilizers

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Foliar nano chitosan potassium fertilizer significantly increased yield and berry quality.

    Effect of Potassium Nano Fertilizer on Yield and Berry Qualities of ‘Flame Seedless’ Grapevines · 2019

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Combined spray of both fertilizers, particularly at 0.1% four times, gave satisfactory improvement in quantity and quality of grapes.

    Yield and Quality of `Banaty' Grapes in Response to Spraying Iron and Zinc · 1997

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Green manure improved grape quality.

    Fertilization with green manure on Chasselas Doré grape vine as an alternative for sustainable viticulture. · 2011

    Opposite direction

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.