Paper · 2011 · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment

Fertilization with green manure on Chasselas Doré grape vine as an alternative for sustainable viticulture.

Liliana Rotaru; Vasile Stoleru; M. Mustea

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In sustainable viticulture, green manure represents a safe and non-polluting way to bring large quantities of organic matter into the soil. Tilling annual plants between rows and using them as green manure has a favourable influence on the physical, chemical and biological features of the soil, without affecting the growth and fructification of the vine. The possibility of using this fertilization system is limited by the rainfall conditions, which must be of about 600 mm annually, of which at least 300 mm in the vegetation period, distributed as useful rain (10 mm). The main objective of this article was the use and influence of green manure fertilization on Chasselas Dore grape vine variety, grown in the temperate continental climate of the northeastern part of Romania (Iasi vineyard). The research showed that compared to the standard cultivated field, the use of green manure led to a faster maturation of the grapes and a slight decrease in grape production, but an improved quality, increase of assimilatory pigment contents and photosynthetic capacity, a slight decrease of disease attack and the increase of the carabids predator population. All these results proved that the green manure fertilization system can also be practiced in the areas where the annual precipitation level is below 600 mm, without significant effect on the production and quality of the grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure accelerated grape maturation.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
maturation of the grapese0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the use of green manure led to a faster maturation of the grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure slightly decreased grape production.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
grape productione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green manure led to a faster maturation of the grapes and a slight decrease in grape production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure improved grape quality.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green manure led to a faster maturation of the grapes and a slight decrease in grape production, but an improved quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased assimilatory pigments and photosynthetic capacity.

Outcome
assimilatory pigment contents and photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase of assimilatory pigment contents and photosynthetic capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure slightly decreased disease attack.

Outcome
disease attacke0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a slight decrease of disease attack”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased carabid predator population.

Interactor
carabidse0other
Outcome
carabids predator populatione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of the carabids predator population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1159 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · phenology · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.