Paper · 2006 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Effect of nitrogen fertiliser on nitrogen partitioning and pool sizes in irrigated Sultana grapevines

M. T. Treeby; D. M. Wheatley

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth and nitrogen (N) percentage of the annual components and the N percentage of the perennial components of unfertilised and fertilised (100 kg N/ha.season) irrigated grapevines (Vitis vinifera cv. Sultana syn. Thompson Seedless) were compared over 2 consecutive seasons. Leaf, stem and fruit samples were measured for dry matter yield and N content at about fortnightly intervals during the growing season, and samples of 1–2-year-old wood, trunk, cane and root were sampled for N content at about fortnightly intervals during the growing season and 4-week intervals during dormancy. Total vine biomass was assessed on unfertilised vines following fruit harvest in the second season. Total vine biomass at this time was about 13.1 kg dry matter/vine, 43% of which was below the soil surface. Dry matter and fruit yield of vines did not respond to N application until the second season with an increase in annual biomass and fruit yield of 75 and 140%, respectively. The N contents of all vine organs were related to vine phenology, with N percentage decreasing in all annual parts during the season. The N percentage in perennial parts was lowest near flowering and fluctuated from then until harvest depending on demand by annual parts, principally leaves and fruit, and supply.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilised vines had about 13.1 kg dry matter/vine after fruit harvest.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
Total vine biomasse0
Value
13.1 kg dry matter/vinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total vine biomass at this time was about 13.1 kg dry matter/vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sultana grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Belowground biomass represented 43% of total vine biomass.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
below the soil surfacee0
Value
43%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“43% of which was below the soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total vine biomass was assessed on unfertilised vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sultana grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased annual vine biomass by 75% in the second season.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
fertilised (100 kg N/ha.season)e1
Outcome
annual biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
75e0
Qualifier
second seasone0
Comparator
unfertilisede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter and fruit yield of vines did not respond to N application until the second season with an increase in annual biomass and fruit yield of 75 and 140%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised and fertilised (100 kg N/ha.season) irrigated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased fruit yield by 140% in the second season.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
fertilised (100 kg N/ha.season)e1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
140%e0
Qualifier
second seasone0
Comparator
unfertilisede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter and fruit yield of vines did not respond to N application until the second season with an increase in annual biomass and fruit yield of 75 and 140%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised and fertilised (100 kg N/ha.season) irrigated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen percentages decreased in all annual vine parts during the season.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
N percentagee0
Direction
decreasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N percentage decreasing in all annual parts during the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sultana grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen percentage in perennial parts was lowest near flowering and fluctuated until harvest.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
N percentage in perennial partse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
near floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N percentage in perennial parts was lowest near flowering and fluctuated from then until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sultana grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · VitisResults differ

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

climate site · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

climate site · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.