Abstract
Grape pomace is a product for which winemakers and scientists have tried to find an effective recycling and disposal method. Disposal of this solid waste will become more difficult as the growth of the wine industry continues. Grape pomace is a heterogeneous mixture of seeds, skins, and pulp, and usually also the stalks for red wines grape varieties. Grape pomace cannot be added directly back to the vineyards because of potential of pathogens and it cannot be incorporated into the soil without damaging the roots of the vines. To transform grape pomace in a valuable fertilizer must be composted. Grape pomace for the experiment was obtained from a private farm of Paulian village, Arad. Fresh grape waste from the local wine variety Negru Batut de Rosia, was prepared to undergo an aerobic bioprocess (composting). Temperature and moisture were measured periodically in each pile and monitored throughout the 6 months period of compost preparation. Registered moisture was in favorable range (19.3 -37.3%) to obtain finally a compost of high quality. The vineyard of Otonel variety composted had better phenological parameters, suffered less from drought, and resist better to disease. Grape yield does not registered differences in the first year after the compost applying and grapevine makes relatively little difference regarding the quality of the must or wine obtained from these grapes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Composted Otonel vines had better phenological parameters.
- Taxon
- Otonel varietye0
- Material
- Otonel varietye0
- Treatment
- compostede0
- Outcome
- phenological parameterse0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The vineyard of Otonel variety composted had better phenological parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Composted Otonel vines suffered less from drought.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The vineyard of Otonel variety composted had better phenological parameters, suffered less from drought”
Claim · model-written summary
Composted Otonel vines resisted disease better.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The vineyard of Otonel variety composted had better phenological parameters, suffered less from drought, and resist better to disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Grape yield showed no difference in the first year after compost application.
- Taxon
- Grapee0
- Treatment
- composte0
- Outcome
- Grape yielde0
- Direction
- does not registered differencese0
- Qualifier
- first yeare0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Grape yield does not registered differences in the first year after the compost applying”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost made relatively little difference to must or wine quality.
VitisNot reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grapevine makes relatively little difference regarding the quality of the must or wine obtained from these grapes”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.