Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium fertilization sources and potassium with iron in the main fertilization did not significantly change leaf zinc

A claim from GRAPEVINE FE-CHLOROSIS ON PODUNAVLJE VINEGROWING AREA · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization sources and potassium with iron in the main fertilization did not significantly change leaf zinc

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Treatment
fertilization of different sources of potassiume2
Outcome
Zinc amount in leaf dry mattere2
Direction
hasn’t significantly changede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINE FE-CHLOROSIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22
e2

“Zinc amount in leaf dry matter hasn’t significantly changed due to fertilization of different sources of potassium or potassium with iron in the main fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3557–3720

Title

GRAPEVINE FE-CHLOROSIS ON PODUNAVLJE VINEGROWING AREA

Mato Drenjančević DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-fd45db3fbc66f0406da1d0eedb4b47659dbfb4ff70f908976f53770b4c0c22aa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

potassium · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.