Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Single inoculation stimulated shoot and leaf weight, shoot length and leaf ground index in grapevine cv Italy.

A claim from Effects of Root Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculations on the Growth and Nutrient Content of Grapevine · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single inoculation stimulated shoot and leaf weight, shoot length and leaf ground index in grapevine cv Italy.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
Italye0
Treatment
single inoculation based bio fertilizerse0
Interactor
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e1symbiont
Outcome
shoot and leaf weight, main shoot length, leaf ground indexe0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triple inoculation and single inoculation based bio fertilizers were found to stimulate overall plant growth, including shoot and leaf weight, main shoot length, leaf ground index, chlorophyll, nitrogen, zinc and iron content of grapevine cv ‘Italy’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–861
e1

“Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–506

Title

Effects of Root Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculations on the Growth and Nutrient Content of Grapevine

Ummugulsum Erdogan; Metin Turan; Fadime Ates; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2018. doi:10.1080/00103624.2018.1474910

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-7755a38837f679e4b8c48221827dd6af993c36864c31c021215218355975481b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 28 positive, 18 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.