Paper · 1984 · PubMed

Reactions of Grape Rootstocks to Pratylenchus vulnus and Meloidogyne spp.

J J Chitambar; D J Raski

18
claims
49
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Five grape rootstocks were inoculated with 0, 100, 1,000, and 10,000 Pratylenchus vulnus. Dogridge and Saltcreek supported low average total numbers of P. vulnus, 136-705/pot, at 12 months after inoculation. Growth of both rootstocks was not affected. Harmony, Couderc 1613, and Ganzin 1 supported high average total numbers, 6-856 times the inoculum levels. Numbers in Harmony continued to increase at all levels but reduced root weight only at the 10,000 level after 12 months. Numbers in Couderc 1613 decreased by 15-30% after 12 months, and root weight was reduced at the 10,000 level. In Ganzin 1, total nematode numbers diminished after 12 months but were still at high levels; growth reduction was proportional to numbers of nematodes added. Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria produced galls and egg masses in Harmony and Couderc 1613 only at 36 C. Galling in Ganzin 1 increased with increasing temperature. Galls in Ganzin 1 at 18 C supported mature females after 90 days. Harmony was resistant to M. incognita in single and concomitant inoculations of P. vulnus and M. incognita. At 250 days after inoculation, total numbers of P. vulnus increased above the inoculum level and the 150-day values; increase was greatest in P. vulnus added singly. Neither nematode species affected growth of Harmony.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dogridge and Saltcreek supported low P. vulnus numbers of 136-705/pot.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Dogridge and Saltcreeke0
Interactor
P. vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pest
Outcome
average total numbers of P. vulnuse0
Direction
lowe0
Value
136-705/pote0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dogridge and Saltcreek supported low average total numbers of P. vulnus, 136-705/pot, at 12 months after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dogridge and Saltcreek growth was unaffected.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
inoculated with 0, 100, 1,000, and 10,000 Pratylenchus vulnuse1
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse1pest
Outcome
Growth of both rootstockse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth of both rootstocks was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five grape rootstocks were inoculated with 0, 100, 1,000, and 10,000 Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony, Couderc 1613 and Ganzin 1 supported high P. vulnus numbers.

Taxon
Grapet0
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse1pest
Outcome
high average total numberse0
Direction
highe0
Value
6-856 times the inoculum levelse0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Harmony, Couderc 1613, and Ganzin 1 supported high average total numbers, 6-856 times the inoculum levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Harmony nematode numbers increased at all levels.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Harmonye0
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse1pest
Outcome
Numbers in Harmonye0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Numbers in Harmony continued to increase at all levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–413 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony root weight fell only at 10,000 after 12 months.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Harmonye1
Treatment
10,000 levele0
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse2pest
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced root weight only at the 10,000 level after 12 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–478 · show in text ↑
e1

“Numbers in Harmony continued to increase at all levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Couderc 1613 nematode numbers decreased 15-30% after 12 months.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Couderc 1613e0
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse1pest
Outcome
Numbers in Couderc 1613e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15-30%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Numbers in Couderc 1613 decreased by 15-30% after 12 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Couderc 1613 root weight fell at 10,000.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Couderc 1613e1
Treatment
10,000 levele0
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse2pest
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“root weight was reduced at the 10,000 level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“Numbers in Couderc 1613 decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–513 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ganzin 1 nematode numbers diminished after 12 months but remained high.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Ganzin 1e0
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse1pest
Outcome
total nematode numberse0
Direction
diminishede0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Ganzin 1, total nematode numbers diminished after 12 months but were still at high levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ganzin 1 growth reduction was proportional to nematodes added.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Ganzin 1e1
Interactor
Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse2pest
Outcome
growth reductione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“growth reduction was proportional to numbers of nematodes added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–747 · show in text ↑
e1

“In Ganzin 1, total nematode numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pratylenchus vulnus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita produced galls and egg masses in Harmony and Couderc 1613 only at 36 C.

Taxon
Grapet0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
galls and egg massese0
Qualifier
only at 36 Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria produced galls and egg masses in Harmony and Couderc 1613 only at 36 C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–871 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. javanica produced galls and egg masses only at 36 C.

Taxon
Grapet0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
galls and egg massese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria produced galls and egg masses in Harmony and Couderc 1613 only at 36 C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–871 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. arenaria produced galls and egg masses only at 36 C.

Taxon
Grapet0
Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0pest
Outcome
galls and egg massese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria produced galls and egg masses in Harmony and Couderc 1613 only at 36 C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–871 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ganzin 1 galling increased with temperature.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Ganzin 1e0
Treatment
increasing temperaturee0
Outcome
Gallinge0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Galling in Ganzin 1 increased with increasing temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ganzin 1 galls at 18 C supported mature females at 90 days.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Ganzin 1e0
Outcome
Galls in Ganzin 1 at 18 C supported mature femalese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Galls in Ganzin 1 at 18 C supported mature females after 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony resisted M. incognita in single and concomitant inoculations.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Harmonye0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
resistant to M. incognitae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Harmony was resistant to M. incognita in single and concomitant inoculations of P. vulnus and M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. vulnus numbers rose above inoculum and 150-day values at 250 days.

Taxon
Grapet0
Interactor
P. vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pest
Outcome
total numbers of P. vulnuse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 250 days after inoculation, total numbers of P. vulnus increased above the inoculum level and the 150-day values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest P. vulnus increase was with P. vulnus added alone.

Taxon
Grapet0
Interactor
P. vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pest
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“increase was greatest in P. vulnus added singly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither nematode affected Harmony growth.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Harmonye0
Treatment
P. vulnus and M. incognitae1
Interactor
P. vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse1pest
Second interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
growth of Harmonye0
Direction
Neither nematode species affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · Second interactorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“Neither nematode species affected growth of Harmony”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1323 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. vulnus and M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1104 · show in text ↑

Pratylenchus vulnus · growth · VitisResults differ

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Meloidogyne incognita · growth · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 28 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.