Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glomus aggregatum inoculation increased first-order lateral-root branching in grapevine cuttings.

A claim from Effects of Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Root Morphology and Nursery Production of Three Grapevine Rootstocks · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus aggregatum inoculation increased first-order lateral-root branching in grapevine cuttings.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Organ / stage
first-order lateral rootse0
Treatment
inoculation with the AM fungus Glomus aggregatume0
Interactor
Glomus aggregatumRhizophagus aggregatuse0symbiont
Outcome
branching of first-order lateral rootse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with the AM fungus Glomus aggregatum in rooting beds of grapevine cuttings changed root morphology, increasing branching of first-order lateral roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–713

Title

Effects of Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Root Morphology and Nursery Production of Three Grapevine Rootstocks

Olga Aguín; J. Pedro Mansilla; Anton Vilariño; et al. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2004. doi:10.5344/ajev.2004.55.1.108

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-aee353de343f142b255654a10f6f3d7a7588d55b0e40ebb5bafc3fa158f3ea05 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Mycorrhization enhanced vine length, shoot length and leaf area.

    Integration Of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi To Grape Vine (Vitis Vinifera L.) In Nursery Stage · 2010

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    AMF inoculation with irrigation every three days produced the highest root length measures.

    Rooting and growth response of grapevine nurslings to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and irrigation intervals · 2007

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    Mycorrhizal grapevine rootstocks showed no enhanced growth effects on physiological parameters compared with non-mycorrhizal rootstocks.

    Does Inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Reduce Trunk Disease in Grapevine Rootstocks? · 2019 · compared with non-mycorrhizal rootstocks

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    AM inoculation produced no significant difference in initial cutting vigor, budbreak or leaf number.

    (119) Mycorrhizal Effects on Grape Acclimation · 2006 · compared with a control

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Mycorrhizal grapevine plants showed threefold higher shoot growth than controls.

    Application of commercial arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungal inoculants to the establishment of micropropagated grapevine rootstock and pineapple plants · 1992 · compared with control plants

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Mycorrhizal plants had greater root and shoot growth than uninoculated controls across lime contents.

    VAM Fungi and Soil Lime Content Influence Rootstock Growth and Nutrient Content · 1997 · compared with control

    Same direction

  7. positive
    AMF inoculation improved grapevine vegetative growth, especially under half irrigation.

    Arbuscular Mycrorrhizal Fungi Inoculation and Applied Water Amounts Modulate the Response of Young Grapevines to Mild Water Stress in a Hyper-Arid Season · 2021

    Same direction

  8. positive
    AMF-treated grapevine plantlets were superior to controls in vine lengths and plant fresh and dry weights.

    Arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi alleviate transplantation shock in micropropagated grapevine (Vitis viniferaL.) · 2006 · compared with control plantlets

    Same direction

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 28 positive, 18 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Direct field inoculation benefited growth of 140 Ruggeri vines in vineyard 1 after two seasons.

    Differential Growth of Mycorrhizal Field-Inoculated Grapevine Rootstocks in Two Replant Soils · 2009

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Inoculation improved grapevine root traits.

    Commercial bioinoculants improve colonization but do not alter the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community of greenhouse-grown grapevine roots · 2025

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    AMF inoculation with irrigation every three days produced the highest root length measures.

    Rooting and growth response of grapevine nurslings to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and irrigation intervals · 2007

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. negative
    P. viticola inoculation commonly prevented spring growth in dormant canes.

    Phomopsis Dieback: A Grapevine Trunk Disease Caused byPhomopsis viticolain California · 2013

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    E. layuense E24 did not impair grapevine growth.

    Epicoccum layuense a potential biological control agent of esca-associated fungi in grapevine · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Inoculation with P. chlamydosporum, P. aleophilum and P. inflatipes inhibited callus formation in 22%, 62% and 72% of cuttings respectively.

    Pathogenicity of three species of Phaeoacremonium spp. on grapevine in California · 2000

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Grey mould development did not differ between inoculated and non-inoculated grapes in the treatments without SO2 pads.

    Quality of two table grape guard cultivars treated with single or dual-phase release SO2 generators · 2012 · compared with without inoculation

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Dogridge and Saltcreek growth was unaffected.

    Reactions of Grape Rootstocks to Pratylenchus vulnus and Meloidogyne spp. · 1984

    Opposite direction

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.