Meloidogyne arenaria 35 claims

species · family Meloidogynidae · animal · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Also written in claims: M. arenaria race 1 — NCBI synonyms: Anguillula arenaria

5 spellings

Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenariaElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. arenaria was identified.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0
Outcome
identifiede0

Verbatim

e0

“Four species were identified: M. incognita, M. hapla, M. arenaria, and M. javanica.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1083

Title

Monitoring of Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Croatia (2022–2024): Occurrence, Distribution and Species Identification

Tamara Rehak Biondić; Jasna Milanović; Ivan Poje; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15112492

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteuria penetrans spores applied by either method reduced Meloidogyne arenaria reproduction compared with the untreated control.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0
Treatment
P. penetrans spores applied by either methode1
Interactor
P. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode reproductione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
greenhouse potse0

Verbatim

e0

“This study compared the effect of applying 3 x 105 P. penetrans spores in furrow versus with the seed at planting on egg production by M. arenaria in greenhouse pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–657
e1

“The results showed that P. penetrans spores applied by either method reduced nematode reproduction compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–791

Title

EFFECTIVENESS OF PASTEURIA PENETRANS APPLIED TO SEED OR FURROW

C. Liu; Patricia Timper Nematropica 2020

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow application of P. penetrans spores reduced egg production more than application with the seed (57.3% vs 35.6% reduction).

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0
Treatment
in furrow applicatione2
Interactor
P. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg productione2
Direction
reducede2
Value
57.3% vs 35.6%e2
Comparator
spores applied along with the seede2
Setting
greenhouse potse0

Verbatim

e0

“This study compared the effect of applying 3 x 105 P. penetrans spores in furrow versus with the seed at planting on egg production by M. arenaria in greenhouse pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–657
e2

“in furrow application reduced egg production more than spores applied along with the seed (57.3% vs 35.6% reduction)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–918

Title

EFFECTIVENESS OF PASTEURIA PENETRANS APPLIED TO SEED OR FURROW

C. Liu; Patricia Timper Nematropica 2020

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedcited backgroundpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior exposure of Meloidogyne arenaria J2 to root exudates reduced attachment of P. penetrans spores (earlier work by the authors).

Taxon
Meloidogyne arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae3
Treatment
prior exposure of Meloidogyne arenaria J2 to root exudatese3
Interactor
P. penetransPasteuria penetranse3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
attachment of P. penetrans sporese3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“prior exposure of Meloidogyne arenaria J2 to root exudates led to reduced attachment of P. penetrans spores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–320

Title

EFFECTIVENESS OF PASTEURIA PENETRANS APPLIED TO SEED OR FURROW

C. Liu; Patricia Timper Nematropica 2020

Other claims from this paper (2)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. arenaria damage to cucumber, pumpkin, tomato and potato was 20-60 %.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0
Interactor
cucumber, pumpkin, tomato and potatoe0host
Outcome
damage to plantse0
Value
20-60 %e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“damage to plants such as cucumber, pumpkin, tomato and potato by the nematode M. arenaria is 20-60 %, damage to the root system is 4-5 points”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–799

Title

Distribution of root-knot nematodes on agricultural plants, harm and their host plants

Shoira Saidova; Holisa Eshova; Guzal Mirzaliyeva; et al. Bulletin of National University of Uzbekistan Mathematics and Natural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56017/2181-1318.1116

Other claims from this paper (19)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. arenaria root-system damage in cucumber, pumpkin, tomato and potato was 4-5 points.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0
Interactor
cucumber, pumpkin, tomato and potatoe0host
Outcome
damage to the root systeme0
Value
4-5 pointse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“damage to plants such as cucumber, pumpkin, tomato and potato by the nematode M. arenaria is 20-60 %, damage to the root system is 4-5 points”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–799

Title

Distribution of root-knot nematodes on agricultural plants, harm and their host plants

Shoira Saidova; Holisa Eshova; Guzal Mirzaliyeva; et al. Bulletin of National University of Uzbekistan Mathematics and Natural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56017/2181-1318.1116

Other claims from this paper (19)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. arenaria damage to sunflower, radish and dill was 20-35 %.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1
Interactor
sunflower, radish and dillRaphanus sativusHelianthus annuusAnethum graveolense0host
Outcome
damage to sunflower, radish and dille0
Value
20-35 %e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“damage to sunflower, radish and dill is 20-35 %, damage to the root system is 1.0-2.8 points”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–893
e1

“by the nematode M. arenaria is 20-60 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–758

Title

Distribution of root-knot nematodes on agricultural plants, harm and their host plants

Shoira Saidova; Holisa Eshova; Guzal Mirzaliyeva; et al. Bulletin of National University of Uzbekistan Mathematics and Natural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56017/2181-1318.1116

Other claims from this paper (19)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. arenaria root-system damage in sunflower, radish and dill was 1.0-2.8 points.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1
Interactor
sunflower, radish and dillRaphanus sativusHelianthus annuusAnethum graveolense0host
Outcome
damage to the root systeme0
Value
1.0-2.8 pointse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“damage to sunflower, radish and dill is 20-35 %, damage to the root system is 1.0-2.8 points”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–893
e1

“by the nematode M. arenaria is 20-60 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–758

Title

Distribution of root-knot nematodes on agricultural plants, harm and their host plants

Shoira Saidova; Holisa Eshova; Guzal Mirzaliyeva; et al. Bulletin of National University of Uzbekistan Mathematics and Natural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56017/2181-1318.1116

Other claims from this paper (19)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. arenaria damage to clover and onions was 15-20 %.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1
Interactor
clover and onionsTrifoliumAllium cepae0host
Outcome
damage to plantse0
Value
15-20 %e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the damage to plants such as clover and onions was 15-20 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–953
e1

“by the nematode M. arenaria is 20-60 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–758

Title

Distribution of root-knot nematodes on agricultural plants, harm and their host plants

Shoira Saidova; Holisa Eshova; Guzal Mirzaliyeva; et al. Bulletin of National University of Uzbekistan Mathematics and Natural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56017/2181-1318.1116

Other claims from this paper (19)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5′-Methoxywaltherione A and waltherione A caused high mortality in juveniles of Meloidogyne arenaria.

Taxon
Meloidogyne arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1
Treatment
5′-Methoxywaltherione A and waltherione Ae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1pest
Outcome
mortality in juvenilese1
Direction
highe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“5′-Methoxywaltherione A and waltherione A caused high mortality in juveniles of Meloidogyne arenaria , Meloidogyne hapla , M. incognita and Bursaphelenchus xylophilus”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 516–682

Title

Control of root‐knot nematodes using Waltheria indica producing 4‐quinolone alkaloids

Ja Yeong Jang; Quang Le Dang; Gyung Ja Choi; et al. Pest Management Science 2019. doi:10.1002/ps.5363

Other claims from this paper (9)