Paper · 2020 · Nematropica

EFFECTIVENESS OF PASTEURIA PENETRANS APPLIED TO SEED OR FURROW

C. Liu; Patricia Timper

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pasteuria penetrans is a parasite of root-knot nematodes. Endospores of P. penetrans attach to the cuticle of second-stage juveniles (J2) and subsequently sterilize the infected female. Previously, we showed that prior exposure of Meloidogyne arenaria J2 to root exudates led to reduced attachment of P. penetrans spores suggesting that nematodes encountering spores within the root zone may be more resistant to spore attachment than are nematodes encountering spores outside the root zone. This study compared the effect of applying 3 x 105 P. penetrans spores in furrow versus with the seed at planting on egg production by M. arenaria in greenhouse pots. The results showed that P. penetrans spores applied by either method reduced nematode reproduction compared to the untreated control; however, in furrow application reduced egg production more than spores applied along with the seed (57.3% vs 35.6% reduction). Greater exposure of M. arenaria J2 to root exudates in the seed compared to the furrow application may explain the difference in application methods. Additionally, furrow application may distribute the spores over a greater area than seed applications, increasing the chances of M. arenaria J2 acquiring spores further from the roots which may impede their ability to infect the roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteuria penetrans spores applied by either method reduced Meloidogyne arenaria reproduction compared with the untreated control.

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0
Treatment
P. penetrans spores applied by either methode1
Interactor
P. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode reproductione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
greenhouse potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · TaxonElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study compared the effect of applying 3 x 105 P. penetrans spores in furrow versus with the seed at planting on egg production by M. arenaria in greenhouse pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that P. penetrans spores applied by either method reduced nematode reproduction compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow application of P. penetrans spores reduced egg production more than application with the seed (57.3% vs 35.6% reduction).

Taxon
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0
Treatment
in furrow applicatione2
Interactor
P. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg productione2
Direction
reducede2
Value
57.3% vs 35.6%e2
Comparator
spores applied along with the seede2
Setting
greenhouse potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · TaxonElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study compared the effect of applying 3 x 105 P. penetrans spores in furrow versus with the seed at planting on egg production by M. arenaria in greenhouse pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–657 · show in text ↑
e2

“in furrow application reduced egg production more than spores applied along with the seed (57.3% vs 35.6% reduction)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedcited backgroundpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior exposure of Meloidogyne arenaria J2 to root exudates reduced attachment of P. penetrans spores (earlier work by the authors).

Taxon
Meloidogyne arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae3
Treatment
prior exposure of Meloidogyne arenaria J2 to root exudatese3
Interactor
P. penetransPasteuria penetranse3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
attachment of P. penetrans sporese3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · TaxonElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“prior exposure of Meloidogyne arenaria J2 to root exudates led to reduced attachment of P. penetrans spores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–320 · show in text ↑