Abstract
The growth and chloride accumulation of 6 grapevine cultivars during 4 weeks were compared under glasshouse conditions in solution cultures containing 0, 50, 100 or 150 meq chloride per liter. The cultivars were 6 Vitis vinifera varieties: 9Sultana9, 9Shiraz9, 9Clare Riesling9, 9Cabernet Sauvignon9, 9Palomino9, and 9Doradillo9. As chloride concentration in the nutrient solutions was increased, shoot-length increments and dry-matter accumulations were lower, and chloride concentration in the mid-shoot petioles greater, in all cultivars. Differences between cultivars were found in the chloride accumulated at the various treatment levels. From these differences it is suggested that when grown on their own roots, the degree of tolerance to high chloride was highest, for 9Cabernet Sauvignon9, followed by 9Shiraz9, 9Sultana9, 9Clare Riesling9, 9Palomino9, and 9Doradillo9, in that order.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing chloride in the nutrient solution lowered shoot-length increments and dry-matter accumulation in all six grapevine cultivars.
- Treatment
- chloride concentration in the nutrient solutionse0
- Outcome
- shoot-length increments and dry-matter accumulationse0
- Direction
- lowere0
VitisNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As chloride concentration in the nutrient solutions was increased, shoot-length increments and dry-matter accumulations were lower, and chloride concentration in the mid-shoot petioles greater, in all cultivars”
e1“grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing chloride in the nutrient solution raised chloride concentration in mid-shoot petioles in all six grapevine cultivars.
- Organ / stage
- mid-shoot petiolese0
- Treatment
- chloride concentration in the nutrient solutionse0
- Outcome
- chloride concentration in the mid-shoot petiolese0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As chloride concentration in the nutrient solutions was increased, shoot-length increments and dry-matter accumulations were lower, and chloride concentration in the mid-shoot petioles greater, in all cultivars”
e1“grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Grapevine cultivars differed in the chloride accumulated at the various treatment levels.
- Outcome
- chloride accumulatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Differences between cultivars were found in the chloride accumulated at the various treatment levels”
e1“grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that, on own roots, tolerance to high chloride was highest for Cabernet Sauvignon, followed by Shiraz, Sultana, Clare Riesling, Palomino and Doradillo.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the degree of tolerance to high chloride was highest, for 9Cabernet Sauvignon9, followed by 9Shiraz9, 9Sultana9, 9Clare Riesling9, 9Palomino9, and 9Doradillo9, in that order”
e1“grapevine”
The same questions in other papers
chloride · growth · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
chloride · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.