Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Nutrient composition of leaves and fruit juice of grapevine as affected by soil and nitrogen fertilization

Andreas D. Peuke

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Effects of soil type and nitrogen (N) fertilizer–application rates on the nutrient composition of grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling) leaves during a growing cycle were compared with the composition of the resulting grape juice. Grapevines were planted in 75 L containers that had been installed in a vineyard and filled with three different vineyard soils (loess, shell lime, and Keuper). Four typical levels of N fertilizer (40, 80, 120, and 160 kg N ha –1 ) were applied. Elemental composition of mature leaves sampled seven times during the growing cycle as well as of the extracted grape juice was analyzed. The time of sampling affected all measured elements (C, N, Ca, K, P, Mg, S, Fe, Zn, Mn, and B) in the leaves. Nitrogen‐fertilizer rate affected the concentrations of all elements except Ca and Mg, while the soil type had significant effects on elemental composition of the leaves with the exception of N, B, and Ca. Soil type had a significant effect on K, S, Mn, and B in the grape juice. Increasing rates of N fertilizer increased C concentration in the grape juice significantly and affected its elemental composition similar to the effects in leaves. This may be explained with the role of leaves as the source for supplying the grapes during ripening via phloem transport. Cluster analysis for the elemental composition of soils, leaves, and grape juice revealed no consistent relationships indicating that other soil characteristics in addition to the mineral concentration influence the elemental composition of grapevine leaves and grape juice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sampling time affected every measured leaf element.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
time of samplinge0
Outcome
all measured elementse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time of sampling affected all measured elements (C, N, Ca, K, P, Mg, S, Fe, Zn, Mn, and B) in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer rate affected all leaf elements except calcium and magnesium.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
Nitrogen‐fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
concentrations of all elements except Ca and Mge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen‐fertilizer rate affected the concentrations of all elements except Ca and Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“The time of sampling affected all measured elements (C, N, Ca, K, P, Mg, S, Fe, Zn, Mn, and B) in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type significantly affected leaf elemental composition except nitrogen, boron and calcium.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
soil typee0
Outcome
elemental composition of the leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil type had significant effects on elemental composition of the leaves with the exception of N, B, and Ca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type significantly affected potassium, sulfur, manganese and boron in grape juice.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Soil typee0
Outcome
K, S, Mn, and B in the grape juicee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil type had a significant effect on K, S, Mn, and B in the grape juice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen fertilizer rates increased carbon concentration in grape juice.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Increasing rates of N fertilizere0
Outcome
C concentration in the grape juicee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing rates of N fertilizer increased C concentration in the grape juice significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer also affected juice elemental composition similarly to leaf composition.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
N fertilizere1
Outcome
elemental compositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“affected its elemental composition similar to the effects in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing rates of N fertilizer increased C concentration in the grape juice significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis found no consistent relationships among soil, leaf and juice elemental compositions.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
no consistent relationshipse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster analysis for the elemental composition of soils, leaves, and grape juice revealed no consistent relationships”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.