Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Changes in sugar content and related enzyme activities in table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to foliar selenium fertilizer

Shuaimeng Zhu; Yinli Liang; Xiaojuan An; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
47
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spraying selenium (Se) fertilizer is an effective method for Se-enriched fruit production. Sugar content in fruit is the major factor determining berry quality. However, changes in sugar metabolism in response to Se fertilizer are unclear. Hence, this study was conducted to identify the effects of Se fertilizer on sugar metabolism and related enzyme activities of grape berries. Additionally, production of leaves with and without Se fertilizer was also investigated. RESULTS: Acid invertase (AI) activity, total soluble sugar and Se content in berries, and photosynthetic rate in leaves produced under Se fertilizer treatments were higher than that of control. Glucose and fructose were the primary sugars in berries, with a trace of sucrose. In both berries and leaves, neutral invertase activity was lower than AI, there was no significant difference in neutral invertase, sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthase between Se fertilizer-treated and control. In berries, AI showed a significant positive correlation with glucose and fructose; also Se content was significantly correlated with sugar content. CONCLUSION: AI played an important role in the process of sugar accumulation in berries; high AI activity in berries and photosynthetic rate in leaves could explain the mechanism by which Se fertilizer affected sugar accumulation in berries. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium fertilizer raised acid invertase activity, total soluble sugar and Se content in berries above control.

Taxon
table grapet0
Organ / stage
berriese1
Treatment
Se fertilizer treatmentse1
Gene
Acid invertase (AI)e1
Outcome
Acid invertase (AI) activity, total soluble sugar and Se content in berriese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acid invertase (AI) activity, total soluble sugar and Se content in berries, and photosynthetic rate in leaves produced under Se fertilizer treatments were higher than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium fertilizer raised photosynthetic rate in leaves above control.

Taxon
table grapet0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
Se fertilizer treatmentse1
Outcome
photosynthetic rate in leavese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acid invertase (AI) activity, total soluble sugar and Se content in berries, and photosynthetic rate in leaves produced under Se fertilizer treatments were higher than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium fertilizer did not significantly change neutral invertase, sucrose synthase or sucrose phosphate synthase.

Taxon
table grapet0
Treatment
Se fertilizere2
Outcome
neutral invertase, sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthasee2
Direction
no significant differencee2
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“there was no significant difference in neutral invertase, sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthase between Se fertilizer-treated and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–979 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral invertase activity was lower than acid invertase (AI) activity in berries and leaves.

Taxon
table grapet0
Organ / stage
berries and leavese3
Gene
neutral invertasee3
Outcome
neutral invertase activitye3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
AIe3

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“In both berries and leaves, neutral invertase activity was lower than AI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–830 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AI activity in berries was significantly positively correlated with glucose and fructose.

Taxon
table grapet0
Organ / stage
berriese4
Gene
AIe4
Outcome
glucose and fructosee4
Direction
positive correlatione4

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“In berries, AI showed a significant positive correlation with glucose and fructose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1063 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Se content was significantly correlated with sugar content in grape berries.

Taxon
table grapet0
Compound
See5
Outcome
sugar contente5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“Se content was significantly correlated with sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose and fructose were the primary sugars in table grape berries, with a trace of sucrose.

Taxon
table grapet0
Organ / stage
berriese6
Outcome
glucose and fructosee6
Qualifier
primary sugars in berries, with a trace of sucrosee6

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“Glucose and fructose were the primary sugars in berries, with a trace of sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–756 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid invertase played an important role in sugar accumulation in berries.

Taxon
table grapet0
Gene
AIe7
Outcome
sugar accumulation in berriese7
Qualifier
important rolee7

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“AI played an important role in the process of sugar accumulation in berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1217 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High AI activity in berries and photosynthetic rate in leaves could explain how Se fertilizer affected sugar accumulation in berries.

Taxon
table grapet0
Treatment
Se fertilizere1
Gene
AIe1
Outcome
sugar accumulation in berriese1
Qualifier
could explain the mechanisme1

Verbatim

t0

“table grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“high AI activity in berries and photosynthetic rate in leaves could explain the mechanism by which Se fertilizer affected sugar accumulation in berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1370 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.