Abstract
In this investigation a selenium uptake and distribution in grapevine organs were estimated. The experiment was conducted in field condition with brown forest soil. This soil type in our country usually indicates a pronounced deficiency of selenium (120-320 ug/kg). The soil was fertilized with Na 2Se04, where the selenium was added as 0 kg Se/ha, 0,5 kg Se/ha and 1,5 kg Se/ha respectively. Investigated variety was Cabernet sauvignon grafted on Kober 5BB rootstock. Three separated plants were used as an experimental treatment, so, at the end of experiment, nine separated plants were analysed. Duration of experiment was from March to the end of September, when the plants were taken from vineyard and after separation of organs (root, trunk, shoots, leaves, berries) were analysed. The analysed plants positively corresponded to the applied selenium fertilizer with significant increase of its concentration, especially in leaves and berries. According to the Se content in control plants (0.02-0.12 fig/g), the highest dose was most efficient in grape leaves having 10.41 ug/g of selenium, while the wooden mass of plants was less affected by Se fertilization. The distribution of Se indicate a polar distribution of this element in grapevine plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Applied selenium fertilizer significantly increased grapevine selenium concentration, especially in leaves and berries.
- Organ / stage
- leaves and berriese0
- Treatment
- selenium fertilizere0
- Outcome
- its concentratione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 0 kg Se/hae2
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The analysed plants positively corresponded to the applied selenium fertilizer with significant increase of its concentration, especially in leaves and berries”
e1“In this investigation a selenium uptake and distribution in grapevine organs were estimated”
e2“The soil was fertilized with Na 2Se04, where the selenium was added as 0 kg Se/ha, 0,5 kg Se/ha and 1,5 kg Se/ha respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest selenium dose yielded 10.41 ug/g selenium in grape leaves.
- Organ / stage
- grape leavese0
- Treatment
- 1,5 kg Se/hae2
- Outcome
- seleniume0
- Direction
- most efficiente0
- Value
- 10.41 ug/ge0
- Qualifier
- 0.02-0.12 fig/ge1
- Comparator
- control plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest dose was most efficient in grape leaves having 10.41 ug/g of selenium”
e1“According to the Se content in control plants (0.02-0.12 fig/g)”
e2“1,5 kg Se/ha”
e3“grapevine organs”
Claim · model-written summary
Grapevine woody mass was less affected by selenium fertilization.
- Treatment
- Se fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- wooden mass of plantse0
- Direction
- less affectede0
- Comparator
- 0 kg Se/hae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the wooden mass of plants was less affected by Se fertilization”
e1“grapevine organs”
e2“0 kg Se/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Selenium showed polar distribution in grapevine plants.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The distribution of Se indicate a polar distribution of this element in grapevine plants”
The same questions in other papers
selenium atom · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
selenium atom · nutrient: content · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.