Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar Se fertilizer application increased Se content in grape berries at maturity by 43.09% compared with control in 2016.

A claim from 1-Methylcyclopropene on Fruit Quality of Se-Enriched Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) during Shelf Life Period · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Se fertilizer application increased Se content in grape berries at maturity by 43.09% compared with control in 2016.

Taxon
table grapee3
Material
Hutai No.8e3
Treatment
foliar Se fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
Se content in grape berriese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
43.09%e2
Qualifier
2016e2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

e1

“foliar Se fertilizer application significantly increased Se content in grape berries at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–544
e2

“the raised rate were 43.09% and 33.24% compared to that of control in 2016 and 2017 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–646
e3

“table grape (Hutai No.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–257

Title

1-Methylcyclopropene on Fruit Quality of Se-Enriched Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) during Shelf Life Period

Shuaimeng Zhu; Yinli Liang; Lan Mu; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10091411

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-22b8599d4ce1f29e1b3d8fa08bfe23e88958449a8c0bfc88f8a0bbb848d169d6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

selenium atom · nutrient: content · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

37 papers: 35 positive, 2 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.