Paper · 1992 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of slow release iron fertilizers on chlorosis in grape

Christine Natt

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Iron‐EDTA (Fe‐EDTA), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4), and a combination of both (50:50) were coated with a natural resin material and tested in a concentration of 75 and 100 mg Fe/kg soil, respectively, for three years in pot experiments with the susceptible grape (Vitis vinifera L.) vine rootstock Couderc 3309. In 1990, two locations in the field were fertilized with coated Fe‐EDTA. The application of coated Fe‐EDTA increased the iron (Fe) content in the youngest leaves about 10% and the chlorophyll content about 71% compared to the three year average values of the untreated plants. The most obvious effect was a better growth, which resulted in a higher dry weight and a greater Fe uptake in the leaves and shoots. Organic acids decreased about 11% and chlorosis symptoms, as in untreated plants, did not appear. By itself, FeSO4 was only applied in the first year, after which chlorosis symptoms occured. The combination of Fe‐EDTA and FeSO4 resulted in an increase of iron content, dry weight, Fe uptake and chlorophyll content and a slight decrease of organic acids. All data except the Fe content were higher by singly applying coated Fe‐EDTA. At one location of chlorotic plants under field conditions coated Fe‐EDTA (8% Fe), applied in the amount of 15 g and 30 g per plant increased chlorophyll content as well. As no chlorosis occured at the second location chlorophyll and Fe content remained unchanged. It was concluded that coated Fe‐EDTA may serve as an Fe fertilizer if the water supply is sufficient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Fe EDTA raised leaf iron content about 10% versus untreated plants.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
youngest leavese0
Treatment
coated Fe‐EDTAe0
Outcome
iron (Fe) contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of coated Fe‐EDTA increased the iron (Fe) content in the youngest leaves about 10% and the chlorophyll content about 71% compared to the three year average values of the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Fe EDTA raised chlorophyll content about 71% versus untreated plants.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
coated Fe‐EDTAe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
71%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of coated Fe‐EDTA increased the iron (Fe) content in the youngest leaves about 10% and the chlorophyll content about 71% compared to the three year average values of the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Fe EDTA improved growth and dry weight.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
coated Fe‐EDTAe1
Outcome
growth, which resulted in a higher dry weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The most obvious effect was a better growth, which resulted in a higher dry weight and a greater Fe uptake in the leaves and shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of coated Fe‐EDTA increased the iron (Fe) content in the youngest leaves about 10% and the chlorophyll content about 71% compared to the three year average values of the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Fe EDTA increased iron uptake in leaves and shoots.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
leaves and shootse0
Treatment
iron fertilizerst1
Outcome
Fe uptakee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a greater Fe uptake in the leaves and shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
t1

“iron fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic acids decreased about 11%.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
iron fertilizerst1
Outcome
Organic acidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Organic acids decreased about 11% and chlorosis symptoms, as in untreated plants, did not appear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
t1

“iron fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorosis symptoms did not appear in treated and untreated plants.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
chlorosis symptoms, as in untreated plants, did not appeare0

Verbatim

e0

“chlorosis symptoms, as in untreated plants, did not appear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4 treatment led to chlorosis symptoms after application only in the first year.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
FeSO4e0
Outcome
chlorosis symptoms occurede0
Qualifier
only applied in the first yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“By itself, FeSO4 was only applied in the first year, after which chlorosis symptoms occured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe EDTA and FeSO4 increased iron content, dry weight and iron uptake.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of Fe‐EDTA and FeSO4e0
Outcome
iron content, dry weight, Fe uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of Fe‐EDTA and FeSO4 resulted in an increase of iron content, dry weight, Fe uptake and chlorophyll content and a slight decrease of organic acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe EDTA and FeSO4 increased chlorophyll content.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of Fe‐EDTA and FeSO4e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of Fe‐EDTA and FeSO4 resulted in an increase of iron content, dry weight, Fe uptake and chlorophyll content and a slight decrease of organic acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe EDTA and FeSO4 slightly decreased organic acids.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of Fe‐EDTA and FeSO4e0
Outcome
organic acidse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of Fe‐EDTA and FeSO4 resulted in an increase of iron content, dry weight, Fe uptake and chlorophyll content and a slight decrease of organic acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Singly applied coated Fe EDTA gave higher measures than the combination except for iron content.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
coated Fe‐EDTAe0
Outcome
All data except the Fe contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All data except the Fe content were higher by singly applying coated Fe‐EDTA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Fe EDTA raised chlorophyll content in chlorotic field plants.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
coated Fe‐EDTA (8% Fe), applied in the amount of 15 g and 30 g per plante0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“At one location of chlorotic plants under field conditions coated Fe‐EDTA (8% Fe), applied in the amount of 15 g and 30 g per plant increased chlorophyll content as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the second location chlorophyll and iron content remained unchanged where chlorosis was absent.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
chlorophyll and Fe contente0
Direction
remained unchangede0
Setting
second locatione0

Verbatim

e0

“As no chlorosis occured at the second location chlorophyll and Fe content remained unchanged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend coated Fe EDTA as fertilizer when water is sufficient.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
coated Fe‐EDTA may serve as an Fe fertilizere0
Qualifier
if the water supply is sufficiente0

Verbatim

e0

“It was concluded that coated Fe‐EDTA may serve as an Fe fertilizer if the water supply is sufficient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.