Paper · 2010 · OENO One

Predicting the occurrence of iron chlorosis in grapevine with tests based on soil iron forms

Isabel Díaz de la Torre; María Del Carmen Del Campillo; Vidal Barrón; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: Iron deficiency symptoms (leaf chlorosis and depressed growth) are common in grapevine growing on calcareous soils. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between these symptoms and the properties of Spanish vineyard soils. Methods and results: Soils from thirty vineyards with leaf chlorosis were used to pot '110 Richter' rootstock for three seasons. Mean leaf chlorophyll concentration, as measured via SPAD, was positively correlated with the soil content in poorly crystalline Fe oxides, as estimated by extraction with various reagents, and negatively correlated with the contents in calcium carbonate equivalent and active lime. Iron deficiency affected plant growth but none of the measured growth variables was correlated with soil properties. The relationships between SPAD and acid ammonium oxalate-, citrate/ascorbateand unbuffered hydroxylamine-extractable Fe conformed to the linear-plateau model, from which clear-cut critical levels (345, 425 and 8 mg kg-1, respectively) could be established. This was not possible with tests based on the alkalinity properties (e.g. the calcite ion activity product), the IPC (« Indice du pouvoir chlorosant »), and the DTPA-extractable Fe test, which generally exhibited a poor predictive value. Conclusion: Tests based on reagents capable of extracting, in part or quantitatively, the most reactive forms of soil Fe were useful to estimate the risk of Fe chlorosis in grapevine. Acid ammonium oxalate, citrate/ascorbate and unbuffered hydroxylamine were the best extractants for this purpose. Significance and impact of study: This study has shown the limited usefulness of tests based on the contents and reactivity of the soil carbonate to predict the occurrence of Fe chlorosis in grapevine; tests capable of estimating the contents of the labile soil Fe forms constitute the best alternative.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll concentration measured by SPAD was positively correlated with soil poorly crystalline Fe oxides.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Compound
poorly crystalline Fe oxidese1
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll concentratione1
Direction
positively correlatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean leaf chlorophyll concentration, as measured via SPAD, was positively correlated with the soil content in poorly crystalline Fe oxides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–523 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll concentration was negatively correlated with soil calcium carbonate equivalent and active lime.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Compound
calcium carbonate equivalent and active limee2
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll concentratione1
Direction
negatively correlatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean leaf chlorophyll concentration, as measured via SPAD, was positively correlated with the soil content in poorly crystalline Fe oxides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–523 · show in text ↑
e2

“negatively correlated with the contents in calcium carbonate equivalent and active lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency affected grapevine growth.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Iron deficiencye1
Outcome
plant growthe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iron deficiency affected plant growth but none of the measured growth variables was correlated with soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–783 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the measured grapevine growth variables was correlated with soil properties.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Outcome
growth variablese1
Qualifier
soil propertiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Iron deficiency affected plant growth but none of the measured growth variables was correlated with soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–783 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical level of acid ammonium oxalate-extractable Fe for SPAD-based chlorosis was 345 mg kg-1.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Compound
acid ammonium oxalatee1
Outcome
critical levelse1
Value
345e1
Qualifier
mg kg-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relationships between SPAD and acid ammonium oxalate-, citrate/ascorbateand unbuffered hydroxylamine-extractable Fe conformed to the linear-plateau model, from which clear-cut critical levels (345, 425 and 8 mg kg-1, respectively) could be established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1040 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical level of citrate/ascorbate-extractable Fe for SPAD-based chlorosis was 425 mg kg-1.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Compound
citrate/ascorbatee1
Outcome
critical levelse1
Value
425e1
Qualifier
mg kg-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relationships between SPAD and acid ammonium oxalate-, citrate/ascorbateand unbuffered hydroxylamine-extractable Fe conformed to the linear-plateau model, from which clear-cut critical levels (345, 425 and 8 mg kg-1, respectively) could be established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1040 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical level of unbuffered hydroxylamine-extractable Fe for SPAD-based chlorosis was 8 mg kg-1.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Compound
unbuffered hydroxylaminee1
Outcome
critical levelse1
Value
8e1
Qualifier
mg kg-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relationships between SPAD and acid ammonium oxalate-, citrate/ascorbateand unbuffered hydroxylamine-extractable Fe conformed to the linear-plateau model, from which clear-cut critical levels (345, 425 and 8 mg kg-1, respectively) could be established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1040 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkalinity-based tests, the IPC and the DTPA-extractable Fe test generally had poor predictive value for chlorosis.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Outcome
predictive valuee2
Direction
poore2
Qualifier
DTPA-extractable Fe teste2
Comparator
tests based on the alkalinity propertiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“This was not possible with tests based on the alkalinity properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1109 · show in text ↑
e2

“and the DTPA-extractable Fe test, which generally exhibited a poor predictive value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tests based on reagents extracting the most reactive forms of soil Fe were useful to estimate the risk of Fe chlorosis in grapevine.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Outcome
risk of Fe chlorosise1
Qualifier
the most reactive forms of soil Fee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tests based on reagents capable of extracting, in part or quantitatively, the most reactive forms of soil Fe were useful to estimate the risk of Fe chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1462 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid ammonium oxalate, citrate/ascorbate and unbuffered hydroxylamine were the best extractants for estimating chlorosis risk.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Outcome
best extractantse1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
DTPA-extractable Fe teste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“iron chlorosis in grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acid ammonium oxalate, citrate/ascorbate and unbuffered hydroxylamine were the best extractants for this purpose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1576 · show in text ↑
e2

“and the DTPA-extractable Fe test, which generally exhibited a poor predictive value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1278 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.