Abstract
Abstract Retaining more fruiting nodes/vine increased yield, but reduced fruit quality in ‘Concord’ grape ( Vitis labrusca L.). Geneva double curtain (GDC) training produced more fruit with better quality than a single wire cordon training system. Positioning the current season’s growth vertically toward the vineyard floor increased yields of vines pruned to short (3-node) spurs. Yield was increased by shoot positioning the season after performing the operation, however, fruit quality was improved during the season that vines were shoot positioned. Pruning vines to 6- or 9-node canes increased yield without a sacrifice of fruit quality as compared to 3-node spurs and reduced the yield increasing potential of shoot positioning. Use of longer canes, GDC training, and shoot positioning grapevines in Arkansas may allow less severe pruning than the currently recommended 30+10 pruning schedule to increase yield without a loss in fruit quality. Pruning weights were generally reduced by treatments which increased yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Retaining more fruiting nodes per vine increased Concord grape yield.
- Taxon
- Vitis labrusca L.
Vitis labruscae0 - Material
- ‘Concord’e0
- Treatment
- Retaining more fruiting nodes/vinee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Retaining more fruiting nodes/vine increased yield, but reduced fruit quality in ‘Concord’ grape ( Vitis labrusca L.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Retaining more fruiting nodes per vine reduced Concord grape fruit quality.
- Taxon
- Vitis labrusca L.Vitis labruscae0
- Material
- ‘Concord’e0
- Treatment
- Retaining more fruiting nodes/vinee0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Retaining more fruiting nodes/vine increased yield, but reduced fruit quality in ‘Concord’ grape ( Vitis labrusca L.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Geneva double curtain training produced more Concord grape fruit than single wire cordon training.
Verbatim
e0“Geneva double curtain (GDC) training produced more fruit with better quality than a single wire cordon training system.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Geneva double curtain training produced better Concord grape fruit quality than single wire cordon training.
Verbatim
e0“Geneva double curtain (GDC) training produced more fruit with better quality than a single wire cordon training system.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Positioning current-season growth vertically toward the vineyard floor increased yields in Concord grape vines pruned to 3-node spurs.
- Taxon
- Grapest0
- Material
- ‘Concord’t0
- Treatment
- Positioning the current season’s growth vertically toward the vineyard floore0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- vines pruned to short (3-node) spurse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Positioning the current season’s growth vertically toward the vineyard floor increased yields of vines pruned to short (3-node) spurs.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot positioning increased Concord grape yield in the following season.
- Taxon
- Grapest0
- Material
- ‘Concord’t0
- Treatment
- shoot positioninge0
- Outcome
- Yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- the season after performing the operatione0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Yield was increased by shoot positioning the season after performing the operation”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot positioning improved Concord grape fruit quality during the season it was performed.
- Taxon
- Grapest0
- Material
- ‘Concord’t0
- Treatment
- shoot positionede0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- during the season that vines were shoot positionede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“fruit quality was improved during the season that vines were shoot positioned.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning Concord grape vines to 6-node canes increased yield compared with 3-node spurs.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning vines to 6- or 9-node canes increased yield without a sacrifice of fruit quality as compared to 3-node spurs and reduced the yield increasing potential of shoot positioning.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning Concord grape vines to 9-node canes increased yield compared with 3-node spurs.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning vines to 6- or 9-node canes increased yield without a sacrifice of fruit quality as compared to 3-node spurs and reduced the yield increasing potential of shoot positioning.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning Concord grape vines to 6-node canes did not sacrifice fruit quality relative to 3-node spurs.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning vines to 6- or 9-node canes increased yield without a sacrifice of fruit quality as compared to 3-node spurs”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning Concord grape vines to 9-node canes did not sacrifice fruit quality relative to 3-node spurs.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning vines to 6- or 9-node canes increased yield without a sacrifice of fruit quality as compared to 3-node spurs”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning Concord grape vines to 6-node canes reduced the yield-increasing potential of shoot positioning compared with 3-node spurs.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning vines to 6- or 9-node canes increased yield without a sacrifice of fruit quality as compared to 3-node spurs and reduced the yield increasing potential of shoot positioning.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning Concord grape vines to 9-node canes reduced the yield-increasing potential of shoot positioning compared with 3-node spurs.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning vines to 6- or 9-node canes increased yield without a sacrifice of fruit quality as compared to 3-node spurs and reduced the yield increasing potential of shoot positioning.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that longer canes, GDC training and shoot positioning in Arkansas may permit less severe pruning than the 30+10 schedule to increase grape yield without losing fruit quality.
Verbatim
e0“Use of longer canes, GDC training, and shoot positioning grapevines in Arkansas may allow less severe pruning than the currently recommended 30+10 pruning schedule to increase yield without a loss in fruit quality.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments increasing Concord grape yield generally reduced pruning weights.
- Taxon
- Grapest0
- Material
- ‘Concord’t0
- Treatment
- treatments which increased yielde0
- Outcome
- Pruning weightse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- generallye0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Pruning weights were generally reduced by treatments which increased yield.”
t0“‘Concord’ Grapes”
The same questions in other papers
climate site · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.