Paper · 2006

Effect of different methods and rates of phosphorus application in mungbean

Syed Khursheed Hussain Shah; Muhammad Aslam; Parvez Khan; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Poor performance of fertilizer phosphorus is one of the major causes depressing the productivity of the crops. An investigation was, therefore, carried out under field conditions to compare the relative efficacy of broadcast, banding and fertigation technique for improving P use efficiency in mungbean. The response to P applied through fertigation was more pronounced as compared to broadcast and banding method. Significantly highest mungbean yield, P uptake, P recoveries and agronomic efficiency were recorded with fertigation and the lowest with broadcast method. The low rate of P application resulted in a relatively higher P recovery and agronomic efficiency compared to higher rate of P application by either method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation produced a more pronounced phosphorus response than broadcast or banding.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
P applied through fertigatione0
Outcome
response to Pe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
broadcast and banding methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response to P applied through fertigation was more pronounced as compared to broadcast and banding method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation gave the significantly highest mungbean yield and broadcasting the lowest.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
mungbean yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
broadcast methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest mungbean yield, P uptake, P recoveries and agronomic efficiency were recorded with fertigation and the lowest with broadcast method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation gave the significantly highest P uptake and broadcasting the lowest.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
broadcast methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest mungbean yield, P uptake, P recoveries and agronomic efficiency were recorded with fertigation and the lowest with broadcast method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation gave the significantly highest P recoveries and broadcasting the lowest.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
P recoveriese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
broadcast methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest mungbean yield, P uptake, P recoveries and agronomic efficiency were recorded with fertigation and the lowest with broadcast method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation gave the significantly highest agronomic efficiency and broadcasting the lowest.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
broadcast methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest mungbean yield, P uptake, P recoveries and agronomic efficiency were recorded with fertigation and the lowest with broadcast method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphorus rate gave relatively higher P recovery than higher phosphorus rate by either method.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
low rate of P applicatione0
Outcome
P recoverye0
Direction
relatively highere0
Comparator
higher rate of P applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low rate of P application resulted in a relatively higher P recovery and agronomic efficiency compared to higher rate of P application by either method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphorus rate gave relatively higher agronomic efficiency than higher phosphorus rate by either method.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
low rate of P applicatione0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
relatively highere0
Comparator
higher rate of P applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low rate of P application resulted in a relatively higher P recovery and agronomic efficiency compared to higher rate of P application by either method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–75 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.