Abstract
This study was done in a strawberry greenhouse to examine the technical and the economical evaluation of two drip irrigation systems including the tape and the drip line in the northern part of Iran. The result showed that all of the technical indices with tape were higher than drip line, and due to statistical analysis reveal a significant difference (P < 0.05). Yield and water productivity (WP) with tape were higher than drip line (P < 0.05). Benefit per drop (BPD) and net benefit per drop (NBPD) with tape were higher than drip line. Net present value, internal rate of capital return and benefit to cost ratio in drip line were higher than tape. In general, regarding technical evaluation tape was better than drip line, besides according to the economical evaluation the drip lines were better than tape.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Technical indices with tape irrigation were higher than with drip line irrigation.
- Taxon
- strawberry
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- tapee1
- Outcome
- technical indicese1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- drip linee1
- Setting
- strawberry greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“This study was done in a strawberry greenhouse”
e1“all of the technical indices with tape were higher than drip line, and due to statistical analysis reveal a significant difference (P < 0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield and water productivity with tape irrigation were higher than with drip line irrigation.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
- Treatment
- tapee2
- Outcome
- Yield and water productivity (WP)e2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- drip linee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was done in a strawberry greenhouse”
e2“Yield and water productivity (WP) with tape were higher than drip line (P < 0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit per drop and net benefit per drop with tape irrigation were higher than with drip line irrigation.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
- Treatment
- tapee3
- Outcome
- Benefit per drop (BPD) and net benefit per drop (NBPD)e3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- drip linee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was done in a strawberry greenhouse”
e3“Benefit per drop (BPD) and net benefit per drop (NBPD) with tape were higher than drip line”
Claim · model-written summary
Net present value, internal rate of capital return and benefit to cost ratio were higher in drip line than in tape irrigation.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
- Treatment
- drip linee4
- Outcome
- Net present value, internal rate of capital return and benefit to cost ratioe4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- tapee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was done in a strawberry greenhouse”
e4“Net present value, internal rate of capital return and benefit to cost ratio in drip line were higher than tape”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.