Paper · 2005 · Plant Soil and Environment

Changes in the biomass production and total soluble protein spectra of nitrate-fed and nitrogen-fixing soybeans subjected to gradual water stress

E. Kirova; D. Nedeva; A. Nikolova; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effect of the sources of nitrogen nutrition (nitrogen fixation or nitrate assimilation) and a gradual water stress on the relative water content, total fresh and dry biomass production, leaf growth, and changes in the total soluble protein spectra were studied. The plants were cultivated as soil cultures in a naturally illuminated greenhouse. Comparative studies were carried out with respect to well-watered, control plants. Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants. Water deficit effects on plant biomass at the end of the period studied (21 days) were independent on the nitrogen source. There was no qualitative difference in the total soluble protein spectra of nitratefed and nitrogen-fixing soybean leaves neither with the progress of development nor under drought conditions. But there was a difference in response to drought in termostable proteins of nitrate-fed and nitrogen-fixing plants. The quantity of termostable proteins in inoculated control plants was lower in some degree compared to uninoculated ones. In inoculated plants the water stress caused an increase in the amount of soluble termostable proteins

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-fixing soybean plants had smaller root development than nitrate-fed plants

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Nitrogen-fixinge0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
nitrate-fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-fixing soybean plants had better relative water content than nitrate-fed plants on the last sampling day

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Nitrogen-fixinge0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
on the last sampling daye0
Comparator
nitrate-fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-fixing soybean plants had large leaf area compared with nitrate-fed plants on the last sampling day

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Nitrogen-fixinge0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
largee0
Qualifier
on the last sampling daye0
Comparator
nitrate-fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit did not change the dependence of soybean plant biomass on nitrogen source over 21 days

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Water deficite1
Outcome
plant biomasse1
Direction
independente1
Qualifier
21 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit effects on plant biomass at the end of the period studied (21 days) were independent on the nitrogen source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–748 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No qualitative difference in total soluble protein spectra between nitrate-fed and nitrogen-fixing soybean leaves

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
total soluble protein spectrae2
Direction
no qualitative differencee2
Comparator
nitratefede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no qualitative difference in the total soluble protein spectra of nitratefed and nitrogen-fixing soybean leaves neither with the progress of development nor under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–941 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought response of thermostable proteins differed between nitrate-fed and nitrogen-fixing soybean plants

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
droughte3
Outcome
response to drought in termostable proteinse3
Direction
differencee3
Comparator
nitrate-fede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
e3

“there was a difference in response to drought in termostable proteins of nitrate-fed and nitrogen-fixing plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated soybean plants had lower thermostable soluble protein quantity than uninoculated plants

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
inoculatede4
Outcome
quantity of termostable proteinse4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
uninoculated onese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
e4

“The quantity of termostable proteins in inoculated control plants was lower in some degree compared to uninoculated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased the amount of soluble thermostable proteins in inoculated soybean plants

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
water stresse5
Outcome
amount of soluble termostable proteinse5
Direction
increasee5
Qualifier
inoculated plantse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen-fixing control and drought plants had relatively smaller root development but better relative water content and large leaf area on the last sampling day than nitrate-fed soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–625 · show in text ↑
e5

“In inoculated plants the water stress caused an increase in the amount of soluble termostable proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1284 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.