Paper · 2016 · Weed Technology

Evaluation of Wick-Applied Glyphosate for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato

Stephen L. Meyers; Katherine M. Jennings; Jonathan R. Schultheis; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton, NC to determine the effect of glyphosate applied POST via a Dixie wick applicator on Palmer amaranth control and sweetpotato yield and quality. In 2007, treatments consisted of glyphosate wicked sequentially 6 and 8 wk after transplanting (WAP) and glyphosate wicked sequentially 6 and 8 WAP followed by (fb) rotary mowing 9 WAP. In 2008, treatments consisted of glyphosate wicked once 4 or 7 WAP, wicked sequentially 4 and 7 WAP, mowed once 4 WAP, and mowed 4 WAP fb wicking 7 WAP. In 2008, Palmer amaranth control 6 WAP varied by location and averaged 10 and 58% for plots wicked 4 WAP. Palmer amaranth contacted by the wicking apparatus were controlled, but weeds shorter than the wicking height escaped treatment. Palmer amaranth control 9 WAP was greater than 90% for all treatments wicked 7 WAP. Competition prior to and between glyphosate treatments contributed to large sweetpotato yield losses. Treatments consisting of glyphosate 7 or 8 WAP (in 2007 and 2008, respectively) frequently had greater no. 1 and marketable yields compared to the weedy control. However, jumbo, no. 1, and marketable yields for all glyphosate and mowing treatments were generally less than half the hand-weeded check. Cracked sweetpotato roots were observed in glyphosate treatments and percent cracking (by weight) in those plots ranged from 1 to 12% for no. 1 roots, and 1 to 6% for marketable roots. Findings from this research suggest wicking might be useful in a salvage scenario, but only after currently registered preemergence herbicides and between-row cultivation have failed to control Palmer amaranth and other weed species below the sweetpotato canopy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 WAP in 2008, Palmer amaranth control after 4-WAP wicking varied by location and averaged 10 and 58%.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
plots wicked 4 WAPe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
variede0
Value
10 and 58%e0
Qualifier
6 WAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2008, Palmer amaranth control 6 WAP varied by location and averaged 10 and 58% for plots wicked 4 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmer amaranth touched by the wick was controlled.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
wicking apparatuse0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth contacted by the wicking apparatus were controlled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmer amaranth below wick height escaped treatment.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
weedse0
Qualifier
shorter than the wicking heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weeds shorter than the wicking height escaped treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton, NC to determine the effect of glyphosate applied POST via a Dixie wick applicator on Palmer amaranth control and sweetpotato yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments wicked at 7 WAP controlled more than 90% of Palmer amaranth at 9 WAP.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
treatments wicked 7 WAPe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
9 WAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth control 9 WAP was greater than 90% for all treatments wicked 7 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmer amaranth competition before and between glyphosate treatments caused large sweetpotato yield losses.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
sweetpotato yield lossese0
Qualifier
Competition prior to and between glyphosate treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition prior to and between glyphosate treatments contributed to large sweetpotato yield losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton, NC to determine the effect of glyphosate applied POST via a Dixie wick applicator on Palmer amaranth control and sweetpotato yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 7 or 8 WAP frequently yielded more no. 1 and marketable roots than the weedy control.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
glyphosate 7 or 8 WAPe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
no. 1 and marketable yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
frequentlye0
Comparator
the weedy controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments consisting of glyphosate 7 or 8 WAP (in 2007 and 2008, respectively) frequently had greater no. 1 and marketable yields compared to the weedy control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton, NC to determine the effect of glyphosate applied POST via a Dixie wick applicator on Palmer amaranth control and sweetpotato yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate and mowing treatments generally produced under half the hand-weeded check yield for jumbo, no. 1 and marketable roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
all glyphosate and mowing treatmentse0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
jumbo, no. 1, and marketable yieldse0
Direction
less thane0
Value
halfe0
Qualifier
generallye0
Comparator
the hand-weeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“jumbo, no. 1, and marketable yields for all glyphosate and mowing treatments were generally less than half the hand-weeded check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton, NC to determine the effect of glyphosate applied POST via a Dixie wick applicator on Palmer amaranth control and sweetpotato yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate-treated plots had 1 to 12% cracking by weight among no. 1 roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Organ / stage
no. 1 rootse0
Treatment
glyphosate applied POSTe1
Outcome
percent cracking (by weight)e0
Value
1 to 12%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent cracking (by weight) in those plots ranged from 1 to 12% for no. 1 roots, and 1 to 6% for marketable roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton, NC to determine the effect of glyphosate applied POST via a Dixie wick applicator on Palmer amaranth control and sweetpotato yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate-treated plots had 1 to 6% cracking by weight among marketable roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Organ / stage
marketable rootse0
Treatment
glyphosate applied POSTe1
Outcome
percent cracking (by weight)e0
Value
1 to 6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent cracking (by weight) in those plots ranged from 1 to 12% for no. 1 roots, and 1 to 6% for marketable roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Clinton, NC to determine the effect of glyphosate applied POST via a Dixie wick applicator on Palmer amaranth control and sweetpotato yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest wicking for salvage only after registered preemergence herbicides and between-row cultivation fail.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
wicking might be useful in a salvage scenarioe0
Qualifier
only after currently registered preemergence herbicides and between-row cultivation have failed to control Palmer amaranth and other weed species below the sweetpotato canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wicking might be useful in a salvage scenario, but only after currently registered preemergence herbicides and between-row cultivation have failed to control Palmer amaranth and other weed species below the sweetpotato canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · quality: postharvest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · quality: postharvest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.