Abstract
Studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 to determine the effect of flumioxazin and S -metolachlor on Palmer amaranth control and ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Covington’ sweetpotato. Flumioxazin at 0, 91, or 109 g ai ha −1 was applied pretransplant 2 d before transplanting alone or followed by (fb) S -metolachlor at 0, 0.8, 1.1, or 1.3 kg ai ha −1 PRE applied immediately after transplanting or 2 wk after transplanting (WAP). Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor immediately after transplanting provided greater than 90% season-long Palmer amaranth control. S -metolachlor applied alone immediately after transplanting provided 80 to 93% and 92 to 96% control in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor 2 WAP provided greater than 90% control in 2007 but variable control (38 to 79%) in 2008. S -metolachlor applied alone 2 WAP did not provide acceptable Palmer amaranth control. Control was similar for all rates of S -metolachlor (0.8, 1.1, and 1.3 kg ha −1 ). In 2008, greater Palmer amaranth control was observed with flumioxazin at 109 g ha −1 than with 91 g ha −1 . Sweetpotato crop injury due to treatment was minimal (< 3%), and sweetpotato storage root length to width ratio was similar for all treatments in 2007 (2.5 for Beauregard) and 2008 (2.4 and 1.9 for Beauregard and Covington, respectively). Sweetpotato yield was directly related to Palmer amaranth control. Results indicate that flumioxazin pretransplant fb S -metolachlor after transplanting provides an effective herbicide program for control of Palmer amaranth in sweetpotato.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential flumioxazin and S-metolachlor immediately after transplanting gave over 90% season-long Palmer amaranth control.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor immediately after transplantinge0
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- Palmer amaranth controle0
- Direction
- greater thane0
- Value
- 90%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor immediately after transplanting provided greater than 90% season-long Palmer amaranth control.”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
S-metolachlor alone immediately after transplanting gave 80 to 93% weed control in 2007.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- S -metolachlor applied alone immediately after transplantinge0
- Interactor
- Palmer amarantht0weed
- Outcome
- controle0
- Value
- 80 to 93%e0
- Qualifier
- 2007e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“S -metolachlor applied alone immediately after transplanting provided 80 to 93% and 92 to 96% control in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
S-metolachlor alone immediately after transplanting gave 92 to 96% weed control in 2008.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- S -metolachlor applied alone immediately after transplantinge0
- Interactor
- Palmer amarantht0weed
- Outcome
- controle0
- Value
- 92 to 96%e0
- Qualifier
- 2008e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“S -metolachlor applied alone immediately after transplanting provided 80 to 93% and 92 to 96% control in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Flumioxazin followed by S-metolachlor at 2 WAP gave 90% control in 2007.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor 2 WAPe0
- Interactor
- Palmer amarantht0weed
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- greater thane0
- Value
- 90%e0
- Qualifier
- 2007e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor 2 WAP provided greater than 90% control in 2007 but variable control (38 to 79%) in 2008.”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Flumioxazin followed by S-metolachlor at 2 WAP gave 38 to 79% control in 2008.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor 2 WAPe0
- Interactor
- Palmer amarantht0weed
- Outcome
- controle0
- Value
- 38 to 79%e0
- Qualifier
- 2008e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Flumioxazin fb S -metolachlor 2 WAP provided greater than 90% control in 2007 but variable control (38 to 79%) in 2008.”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
S-metolachlor alone at 2 WAP did not provide acceptable weed control.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- S -metolachlor applied alone 2 WAPe0
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- Palmer amaranth controle0
- Direction
- did not provide acceptablee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“S -metolachlor applied alone 2 WAP did not provide acceptable Palmer amaranth control.”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control was similar across S-metolachlor rates.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- S -metolachlore0
- Interactor
- Palmer amarantht0weed
- Outcome
- Controle0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- all ratese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Control was similar for all rates of S -metolachlor (0.8, 1.1, and 1.3 kg ha −1 ).”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2008, flumioxazin at 109 g ha−1 gave greater weed control than 91 g ha−1.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- flumioxazin at 109 g ha −1e0
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- Palmer amaranth controle0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- 2008e0
- Comparator
- 91 g ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“In 2008, greater Palmer amaranth control was observed with flumioxazin at 109 g ha −1 than with 91 g ha −1 .”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide treatment caused minimal sweetpotato injury below 3%.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- treatmente0
- Outcome
- Sweetpotato crop injurye0
- Direction
- minimale0
- Value
- < 3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Sweetpotato crop injury due to treatment was minimal (< 3%), and sweetpotato storage root length to width ratio was similar for all treatments in 2007 (2.5 for Beauregard) and 2008 (2.4 and 1.9 for Beauregard and Covington, respectively).”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage root length-to-width ratio for Beauregard was 2.5 in 2007, similar across treatments.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beauregarde0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- storage root length to width ratioe0
- Direction
- similare0
- Value
- 2.5e0
- Qualifier
- 2007e0
- Comparator
- all treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Sweetpotato crop injury due to treatment was minimal (< 3%), and sweetpotato storage root length to width ratio was similar for all treatments in 2007 (2.5 for Beauregard) and 2008 (2.4 and 1.9 for Beauregard and Covington, respectively).”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage root length-to-width ratio for Beauregard was 2.4 in 2008, similar across treatments.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beauregarde0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- storage root length to width ratioe0
- Direction
- similare0
- Value
- 2.4e0
- Qualifier
- 2008e0
- Comparator
- all treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Sweetpotato crop injury due to treatment was minimal (< 3%), and sweetpotato storage root length to width ratio was similar for all treatments in 2007 (2.5 for Beauregard) and 2008 (2.4 and 1.9 for Beauregard and Covington, respectively).”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage root length-to-width ratio for Covington was 1.9 in 2008, similar across treatments.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Covingtone0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- storage root length to width ratioe0
- Direction
- similare0
- Value
- 1.9e0
- Qualifier
- 2008e0
- Comparator
- all treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Sweetpotato crop injury due to treatment was minimal (< 3%), and sweetpotato storage root length to width ratio was similar for all treatments in 2007 (2.5 for Beauregard) and 2008 (2.4 and 1.9 for Beauregard and Covington, respectively).”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweetpotato yield was directly related to Palmer amaranth control.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- Palmer amaranth controle0
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- Sweetpotato yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Sweetpotato yield was directly related to Palmer amaranth control.”
t0“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend pretransplant flumioxazin followed by posttransplant S-metolachlor for Palmer amaranth control in sweetpotato.
- Taxon
- sweetpotato
Ipomoea batatase0 - Treatment
- flumioxazin pretransplant fb S -metolachlor after transplantinge0
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- effective herbicide program for control of Palmer amaranthe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Results indicate that flumioxazin pretransplant fb S -metolachlor after transplanting provides an effective herbicide program for control of Palmer amaranth in sweetpotato.”
The same questions in other papers
metolachlor · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →flumioxazin · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →transplanting · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.