Intervention effectmodel-written summary

S-metolachlor alone immediately after transplanting gave 92 to 96% weed control in 2008.

A claim from Evaluation of Flumioxazin andS-metolachlor Rate and Timing for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor alone immediately after transplanting gave 92 to 96% weed control in 2008.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
S -metolachlor applied alone immediately after transplantinge0
Interactor
Palmer amarantht0weed
Outcome
controle0
Value
92 to 96%e0
Qualifier
2008e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S -metolachlor applied alone immediately after transplanting provided 80 to 93% and 92 to 96% control in 2007 and 2008, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–675
t0

“Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–122

Title

Evaluation of Flumioxazin andS-metolachlor Rate and Timing for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Sweetpotato

Stephen L. Meyers; Katherine M. Jennings; Jonathan R. Schultheis; et al. Weed Technology 2010. doi:10.1614/wt-d-09-00057.1

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-d7a2364ddbbde8267431c7adb4ada8a4a92a291e3f7a3c0434de95ca0ff7c627 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

metolachlor · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

transplanting · control · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.