Paper · 2005 · Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scieves

Weed control effect of paraquat in untilled fields and its influence on the light and yield of rapeseed

Wenda Zhu

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The weed control effects of paraquat and subsequent dynamics in untilled rape fields,as well as the influence of paraquat on the sunlight and crop yield were studied to evaluate the application prospect of paraquat and establish a weed management system in untilled rapeseed fields.The results showed that paraquat provided good control effects on weeds in untilled rapeseed fields,the overall effects ranged from 98.50% to 99.49% five days after treatment(DAT),decreased and maintained above 85% for 160 DAT with graduall decrease.The efficacy was higher on Alopecurus aequalis,Malachium aquaticum and Beckmannia syzigachne,than on Mazus japonicus.Paraquat application significantly improved the light conditions in rapeseed field and the light penetration rate increased with the dosage of herbicide.The application of paraquat had no effect on the plant height and 1000-seed weight,whereas the height of first branch,numbers of branches and siliquae were markedly influenced,resulting in a significant yield increase of rapeseed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat weed control was 98.50% to 99.49% at five days.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
paraquate0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control effects on weedse0
Direction
goode0
Value
98.50% to 99.49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“paraquat provided good control effects on weeds in untilled rapeseed fields,the overall effects ranged from 98.50% to 99.49% five days after treatment(DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–461 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat weed control declined but stayed above 85% through 160 days.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Outcome
maintained above 85% for 160 DATe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
85%e0

Verbatim

e0

“decreased and maintained above 85% for 160 DAT with graduall decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat efficacy was higher against three weed species than Mazus japonicus.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Interactor
Alopecurus aequalisAlopecurus aequalise0weed
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Mazus japonicuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alopecurus aequalis
Alopecurus aequalis · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Thommybe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy was higher on Alopecurus aequalis,Malachium aquaticum and Beckmannia syzigachne,than on Mazus japonicus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat improved light conditions in rapeseed fields.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
Paraquat applicatione0
Outcome
light conditionse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Paraquat application significantly improved the light conditions in rapeseed field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–731 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light penetration increased with herbicide dosage.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
dosage of herbicidee0
Outcome
light penetration ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“the light penetration rate increased with the dosage of herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat did not affect rapeseed plant height or 1000-seed weight.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
application of paraquate0
Outcome
plant height and 1000-seed weighte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of paraquat had no effect on the plant height and 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat markedly influenced first branch height, branch number and siliqua number.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Outcome
height of first branch,numbers of branches and siliquaee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the height of first branch,numbers of branches and siliquae were markedly influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat significantly increased rapeseed yield.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a significant yield increase of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1031 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.