Abstract
In this study, canola harvest methods that are sometimes associated with pod sealant were evaluated to mitigate pod shattering. The following six harvest methods were evaluated at four locations in the presence or absence of a pod sealant: a) untreated direct harvesting; b) swathing; c) diquat + direct harvesting (DH); d) glufosinate + DH; e) paraquat + DH and f) paraquat + diuron + DH. The analysis of variance showed significant interactions at the four locations between the presence and absence of the pod sealant and the harvest methods (P <= 0.01). When harvesting was performed at the ideal time, the windrowing and direct harvest methods resulted in higher yields. In this case, the use of pre-harvested herbicides and pod sealant were not necessary to mitigate pod shattering. However, when harvesting was performed later, pre-harvest desiccation with diquat or paraquat resulted in the best yields. Thus, the use of pod sealant was the most effective method. The windrowing method should not be used at an inappropriate time because it can result in seed shattering when plants are drying in the field.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Pod sealant presence interacted significantly with harvest method across four locations.
- Taxon
- canola
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- pod sealante0
- Outcome
- interactionse0
- Value
- P <= 0.01e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significant interactions at the four locations between the presence and absence of the pod sealant and the harvest methods (P <= 0.01)”
t0“canola”
Claim · model-written summary
At ideal harvest time, windrowing and direct harvest gave higher yields.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napust0
- Treatment
- windrowing and direct harvest methodse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- ideal timee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When harvesting was performed at the ideal time, the windrowing and direct harvest methods resulted in higher yields.”
t0“canola”
Claim · model-written summary
At ideal harvest time, the authors deemed herbicides and pod sealant unnecessary to mitigate shattering.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napust0
- Treatment
- pre-harvested herbicides and pod sealante0
- Outcome
- not necessary to mitigate pod shatteringe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of pre-harvested herbicides and pod sealant were not necessary to mitigate pod shattering”
t0“canola”
Claim · model-written summary
At later harvest, diquat or paraquat preharvest desiccation gave the best yields.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napust0
- Treatment
- pre-harvest desiccation with diquat or paraquate0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- when harvesting was performed latere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when harvesting was performed later, pre-harvest desiccation with diquat or paraquat resulted in the best yields.”
t0“canola”
Claim · model-written summary
The pod sealant was described as the most effective method.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napust0
- Treatment
- pod sealante0
- Outcome
- most effective methode0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of pod sealant was the most effective method.”
t0“canola”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors advised against windrowing at an inappropriate time because seeds can shatter as plants dry.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napust0
- Treatment
- windrowing methode0
- Outcome
- should not be used at an inappropriate timee0
- Qualifier
- seed shattering when plants are drying in the fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The windrowing method should not be used at an inappropriate time because it can result in seed shattering when plants are drying in the field.”
t0“canola”
The same questions in other papers
diquat · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
paraquat · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →wind · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
drought · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.